Bracing for May 9 #Halalan2022

The Leni-Kiko monster rallies continue to draw impressively bigger and bigger crowds, and a number of credible political pundits continue to believe that Leni can still pull off a win despite Marcos Jr.’s lead in the surveys. That is, IF we take advantage of the palpable momentum and push even harder toward including the fringes in this movement for change.

May oras pa, ang pahiwatig ni Ronnie Holmes ng Pulse Asia kay Karen Davila sa ANC News noong April 8.

KAREN DAVILA. Historically speaking, based on your experience, have you seen a dramatic shift in surveys in, like, 30 days?

HOLMES. I would say that it’s possible, it’s really quite possible. It would really depend on how each candidate would really change their strategy, intensify their campaign. The last 30 days is like the last 2 minutes of a basketball game. The other team might be leading 12 to 15 points, the last 2 minutes is a crucial thing. If someone shoots five 3-pointers, the game… it’s tied.

So it’s not a question of whether the race is done, you still have 30 days. Those 30 days of campaign will be crucial. It might be best for some candidates to look back in term of their messages, how it can be refined and trying to escalate activities that will generate public support for their candidacy.

Parang Leni-Kiko camp mismo ang pinaparinggan ni Holmes, at sana nakikinig sina Bam Aquino, sana they go beyond the bongga rallies, do the rounds of public markets and factories, apart from house-to-house ikot-sa-barangay.  Ninoy Aquino’s campaign strategy in 1965 when he ran for and placed 2nd (of 8) in the senatorial race, as told by Nick Joaquin in The Aquinos of Tarlac (1983) pages 313-316, might inspire, kahit last minute.

On another front, La Salle Prof. Julio Teehankee told Karmina Constantino in a Dateline: Philippines interview [ANC 4 April] that he  thinks it’s time for something drastic, which sounds like Davila’s “dramatic shift”.

TEEHANKEE.  The frontrunner is sitting pretty just waiting for Election Day to happen, so unless something drastic, you know, some major earthshaking event will happen between now and Election Day…  Time is running out, and he has a comfortable lead. So something must happen to move the needle in favor of those challenging the frontrunner.

KC. Is that pointing to some sort of consolidation, and now is the time to do it?

TEEHANKEE.  It’s now or never. I think those who are seriously thinking of the future of the country should [follow] the lead of similar individuals in history. They must do a Day Laurel or even a Mar Roxas at this point.

Unfortunately Isko, Ping, and Manny do not seem to be up to the sacrifice. And it’s understandable. VP Doy Laurel may have later regretted giving way to Cory in ’86 because he and Cory didn’t get along at all post-EDSA, and he ended up sidelined and ridiculed. I bet Mar Roxas regretted giving way to PNoy, settling for a VP run and waiting for his turn, when he lost to VP Binay in 2010 and then to President Duterte in 2016.  Not very encouraging outcomes there.

TEEHANKEE. Based on the 2016 exit poll of SWS, 54.2 % [of voters] decided only around this time, and a significant 18 % decided on Election Day itself.

Perhaps that’s what’s giving hope to every candidate that s/he will be the chosen one of a majority of voters still deciding at this point in time.  But one can’t win on hope, not when these votes are going at least 4 ways, and not when the frontrunner has been working on a win for a full decade.

Hopefully this Holy Week finds Isko, Ping, and Manny accepting the fact that VP Leni is far ahead of them all, ahead enough to have a real chance of beating Marcos Jr. as she did in 2016, but only if the three throw their support behind her like true gentlemen and statesmen and patriots would—which is exactly how Doy Laurel is remembered, never mind the petty bickering with Cory after.

Surely the three do not wish to go down in history as 2022’s batch of would-be presidents who did not really care about nation. When this is over, win or lose, there will be a reckoning.

Meanwhile, the world that watched and applauded us when we ousted Marcos in ’86 is again watching, this time aghast that another Marcos is running for president and looking like he might win despite his father’s many crimes. And they’re wondering what happened, how could we let this happen, didn’t we see this coming?

I daresay we didn’t think they would go this far. I daresay we were counting on some remorse and some delicadeza on their part, for nation’s sake. Alas. Iba talaga ang mga Marcos.

Kelvin to Winnie: BNPP facts NOT “fun”

Rejoinder to Winnie Monsod’s Nuclear fun facts for Kelvin of 26 March [Inquirer]. Kelvin Rodolfo submitted this two days later [28 March] to Inquirer‘s opinion editor, it was acknowledged received but remains unpublished. Sharing here, thanks to Floro Quibuyen.

My dear Winnie,

You defend our electorate: ‘Mr. Duterte was a latecomer, and they had no time to study him as closely as the other candidates who were more well-known. Mr. Duterte had the attractiveness of a newcomer and little was known about him, or there was no time to spread the word.’ So of course he was elected, yes?

Let’s paraphrase: “Nuclear power is a virtually unknown latecomer, made attractive by propaganda, and Filipinos have no time to study it as closely as other better-known energy options.” But activate BNPP now! “What are we waiting for?”

You say that Filipinos overwhelmingly favor nuclear power because it would be cheap. You are the economist; though but an humble geologist, I have documented this fallacy: “Without taxpayer subsidy, nuclear power is absolutely impossible” [rappler.com/voices/thought-leaders/opinion-without-taxpayer-subsidy-nuclear-power-absolutely-impossible\]

Also: “So how much greenhouse gas does nuclear power really generate?” [rappler.com/voices/thought-leaders/opinion-how-much-greenhouse-gas-does-nuclear-power-generate/]

If I send you their documentation and you send me contradictory documentation, can we discuss as seasoned academics? Then answer commentator Ga Go: “bakit di nyo sagutin ang tanong ng mga tambay sa kalye namin, magkano ang kuryente galing sa nuclear plant?” With its unsolvable waste-containment problem, I certainly can’t.

Watts Bar II was originally built sturdily; BNPP wasn’t, said Cory government, including your NEDA in 1986.

Echoing Arcilla, you imply that, living in nuclear-powered Illinois, I hypocritically oppose BNPP. I’m against nuclear power globally, but bemoaning Illinois’ very real nuclear problems is not what we’re doing here.

We’ve lost touch, Winnie. Since 2008 Kathy and I are permaculture farmers in non-nuclear Wisconsin. Our farmhouse is earth-sheltered, cool in the summer; passive-solar and sub-floor solar-heated in winter. Solar panels and a wind generator provide all of our electricity, including power for our plug-in Prius hybrid, and we sell a modest surplus to the grid. Mahar Lagmay’s students have visited; check them out.

About Australia: I’m with you in decrying its big carbon footprint. But the point was, and is: Australia has the most uranium, but doesn’t use nuclear power because… their economists are not as smart) as you?

I wish you hadn’t anointed Carlo Arcilla your geological expert, because I ashamedly must share responsibility for his schooling. I discuss his BNPP expertise in “Propaganda about faulting, earthquakes, and the Bataan Nuclear Power Plant”  [rappler.com/voices/thought-leaders/opinion-propaganda-faulting-earthquakes-bataan-nuclear-power-plant]

He started agitating to activate BNPP before he even knew where it was, accepting a possible fault passing through its site, since confirmed. Why? He had mislocated BNPP 8 kilometers up the coast! Then he denied its existence to Inquirer’s Tonette Orejas, based on studies he hadn’t conducted yet. That was in 2009.

I signed his dissertation in 1998. Long ago, I gave up badgering him to publish it with scientific peer review. His promises to publish his “no Fault” studies carry little weight, except with you… Hoy, Caloy, mura ang laway.

Without corroborating evidence, Arcilla contradicts Academician Mahar Lagmay and his fifteen geologist associates (Foray 7). The Geological Society of London, the world’s oldest, which preserves its prestige with rigorous review standards, published their work on BNPP’s hazards. Arcilla implies he hasn’t even read it!

You ask me, “You don’t think a rehabilitated BNPP will have to pass safety requirements?” But that hasn’t happened yet, and you are already demanding its activation. You and Arcilla argue similarly.

Arcilla claims “PNRI is also the nuclear regulator, and being its director, we will have to sign the license to operate the nuclear power plant, following the IAEA safety guidelines. I will NEVER sign a license for the plant if there is an active fault beneath it.”

Actually, in May 2021 Congress started to establish a Philippine Atomic Regulatory Commission to regulate the nuclear energy industry. Secretary of Science and Technology Fortunato de la Peña concurred: “there needs to be a separate agency” apart from PNRI:   bworldonline.com/house-panel-approves-bill-setting-up-atomic-commission/

About the actual, serious problems with BNPP’s sisters Krsko in Slovenia, Kori 2 in South Korea and Angra 1 in Brazil, see my Foray 28, out last week: “Activating BNPP would give cancer to workers and adults living nearby”. [rappler.com/voices/thought-leaders/opinion-activating-bnpp-give-cancer-workers-adults-living-nearby/ ]

Some leaders of the National Academy of Science and Technology may advocate nuclear. DOST houses and funds NAST, making their objectivity questionable. However, chemist Fabian Dayrit, Academy Vice President and President of the Integrated Chemists of the Philippines, vigorously opposes BNPP and nuclear power.

I find no BNPP facts “fun”. In April, Rappler will publish Foray 29: “Activate BNPP? Increase Childhood Cancers in Bataan and Beyond”. I’m sending an advance copy with documentation to you and other commentators; do with it what you will, within the limits of the copyright that Rappler shares.

May you and yours stay safe from Covid and BNPP!

Kelvin