Category: machismo

Macho vibes

I saw it coming, of course, that Atty. Bel Zamora would be belittled and bashed, though I didn’t expect it from a senator-judge. Totoong nababalot sa language problem natin, na ubod ng macho, ang patuloy na mababang pagtingin sa kababaihan. Like women were only for flirting or making ligaw, everything is sex-related, even when they are just doing their jobs.

BEYOND THE ‘CONYO’ ACCENT: Class, Language, and the Sexualization of Public Speech
by Atty @James D. Lansang

When Quezon City Rep. Ysabel Zamora questioned a witness during recent House impeachment proceedings, much of the online reaction bypassed the legal relevance of the testimony. Instead, social media comment sections fixated on her speech pattern—specifically her soft, English-dominant cadence and her distinct pronunciation of Tagalog words like baril.

While public commentary quickly devolved into accusations of flirtation, “bedroom voices,” and sexualized humor, the phenomenon points to two deeper, intersecting issues in modern Philippine public discourse: the social baggage attached to the “conyo” speech register, and the troubling tendency to sexualize women when their public performance escapes familiar categories.

As commentator Paul S. Galutera (known online as Morning Coffee Thoughts) observed, what many labeled as an attempt at seduction was simply a familiar linguistic profile. For decades, sociolinguists have noted that conyo is not merely an accent; it is a recognized speech register historically tied to urban, private-school-educated, or upper-middle-class environments.

Public perception in the Philippines remains deeply sensitive to how authority figures speak. Years ago, in an essay later included in my recent book ”I Was Hungry and… You Formed a Committee?” I examined our long-standing struggle to establish a “standard Filipino English”—a form of clear, professional English accessible across regions and social classes without requiring citizens to mimic foreign accents or slip into disjointed “Taglish.” Neighboring Singapore has since evidently developed its own “Singlish,” a distinct local variety they seem entirely comfortable with, but our own path with English and Taglish remains far more conflicted.

The premise of developing a standard variety was straightforward: language should serve as a functional bridge for civic life, legal proceedings, and broad international understanding, rather than a marker of social division.

Instead, Philippine speech has continued to fracture along class and cultural lines. On one end is the derision faced by those who speak with regional accents; on the other is the instant suspicion directed at those who speak with elite conyo inflections. In politics, sounding “too English” or “too elite” can draw immediate public detachment.

However, the reaction to Zamora went beyond routine anti-elitist ribbing. Critique of her courtroom strategy or delivery quickly morphed into explicit gendered commentary. As research on online misogyny in Philippine politics continuously highlights, converting a female official’s professional presence into sexualized jokes diminishes her perceived legitimacy as a public actor.

The double standard becomes stark when contrasted with actual instances of inappropriate behavior in legislative halls. When male lawmakers have openly introduced explicit or suggestive remarks into official records, the reactions have often been treated as mere lapses in decorum or brushed off as humor. Yet when a female prosecutor simply delivers testimony in her natural, lifelong speaking voice, observers manage to project sexual intent onto her vocabulary.

Critiquing a lawmaker’s preparation, line of questioning, or political stance is fair game in a democracy. Even expressing distaste for a particular accent falls within ordinary public commentary. But when public assessment shifts from evaluating evidence to speculating on a speaker’s private motives or anatomy, the debate ceases to be about governance.

Our public sphere would benefit from greater discipline on two fronts: a more conscious effort to foster a clear, professional Standard Filipino English that unites rather than alienates, and a firm refusal to let gendered tropes replace substantive public critique.

jeemsdee@yahoo.com

Kwatro Alas & Mercury Retrograde

My mistake, giving Chiz Escudero the benefit of the doubt all through the “forthwith” furor. I imagined that he had valid reasons for delaying the trial. I actually thought that when the time came, he was capable of rising above the political fray and leveling up as presiding judge of the impeachment court a la Davide in 2000 and Enrile in 2012.

Instead, August 6 saw him and the bulk of 18 senators all set to dismiss the case. Puro pala sila DDS. Kapani-paniwala tuloy ang chizmiz that he seriously wants to run for president in 2028. Politics much?

Mabuti na lang at kumontra nang bongga sina Tito Sotto, Ping Lacson, at Risa Hontiveros, armed with arguments that forced the 18 to back down, though only a little, as in, archive na lang (mas maigi sana if they tabled it), habang hinihintay ang final ruling ng Supremes, hopefully only after hearing oral arguments of complainants and friends of the court.

AS ABOVE, SO BELOW

To people who are into astrology, the August 6 drama did not surprise: Mercury retrograde kasi — seen from planet Earth, itsura’y paatras ang galaw ng Mercury, the planet associated with the rational mind and everyday communications, kayâ paatras din at hindi pasulong o paabante ang galaw ng mga isip natin, senators and magistrates not exempted.

Siyempre nagulat ako, at naaliw, nang ungkatin ang Mercury retrograde sa Kwatro Alas kahapon. Diyatat “woke” pala these machos to cosmic and occult vibes? https://www.youtube.com/

MICHAEL FAJATIN: Maraming nagsasabi — di ko alam kung alam niyo ‘to, guys, kasi millennial ako eh. Yung mercury retrograde, have you heard about it?

ALAN GERMAN: Of course I have …

FAJATIN: Simple explanation, ang mercury retrograde daw, hindi ka dapat nagde-decide ngayon dahil affected ka …

GERMAN: Because of the tides, because of the tides, the planetary alignment, naaapektuhan ang ating mga tides, pati yung liquid sa ating brain daw, naaapektuhan ng tides daw, at sa ating utak…

FAJATIN: So ibig sabihin hindi magiging sigurado ang desisyon mo pag ngayon mo na [ginawa] ‘to?

GERMAN: Parang you are confused, ayon sa mga naniniwala.

RONALD LLAMAS: Kaya pala ganon yung August 6 sa senado! Naapekto yung ibig pahiwatig!

“Because of the tides … the tides … the planetary alignment”?!? The effects of Mercury retrograde have nothing to do with “tides” that are caused by the Moon’s gravitational pull kapag full moon (that came three days later pa, August 9 mismo while Kwatro Alas was broadcasting līve) when the alignment of Sun, Moon, and Earth heightens emotions and yes, brings on high tides and howling egos, but it’s fleeting, peaks quickly, and then dissipates.

Mercury retrograde, in contrast, is some three weeks long. Mercury has been moving paatras since July 18 and starts moving paabante today, August 11, though quite slowly for another week or so, bumubuwelo kumbaga, before moving on at its usual speed.

Fajatin got some of it right. When Mercury is retrograde it’s not a good time to make certain decisions. Lalo na on old issues, na akala natin ay tapos na, settled na, e hindi pa pala. Tipong paulit-ulit lang yung problema dahil paulit-ulit din lang, same-old same-old, ang solusyon natin. Mercury retrograde nudges us into rethinking, reviewing, reconsidering, how to handle things differently, break out of patterns that trap, para maiba rin ang patutunguhan, toward possibly better outcomes, when Mercury again moves forward.

BUT THEN AGAIN

Unfortunately, our issues are so deep-seated and find us so divided, there are no quick and easy solutions. Even if all the planets were wonderfully configured, kung hindi naman tayo handang kumilos as a united opposition for systemic change vs dynasties and oligarchs atbp., wala rin.

Which brings me back to Kwatro Alas and their kind of political commentary. For what it’s worth, hearts in the right place naman, these men, but stick to the stuff you truly know, guys. Otherwise, nakakahinayang ang loss of credibility. Also, we could do with a lot less self-approbation, na nakaka-turn-off. And a lot less laughter, please. The sad state of the nation is no laughing matter.

Bullying Ms Gina

Boo Chanco

Visuals and images convey more messages than we are conscious of. Whoever said a picture is worth a thousand words was not kidding. This is why communications strategists are as careful with the visuals presented, including body language, as they are about words.

Read on…

speaker alvarez, sex videos #everywoman

Speaker Pantaleon “Bebot” Alvarez on Wednesday said he would allow the House of Representatives justice committee investigating the alleged Bilibid drug trade to present the alleged sex scandal of Senator Leila De Lima.

… Alvarez called the sex video the only material evidence to prove De Lima had a relationship with her purported lover, her former driver Ronnie Dayan, who inmates in the national penitentiary and a National Bureau of Investigation official said collected pay-offs for De Lima from the Bilibid drug trade.

mr. speaker, even if those sex videos were proven to be authentic, they would not prove that de lima was the recipient of money allegedly collected by dayan from bilibid druglords atbp.  it is obvious that making those videos public is meant to shame de lima, nothing more.  as if it weren’t bad enough that the prez has seen fit to publicly accuse her of screwing around with whoever.  kailangan pa talagang ipakita, ipalabas, i-exhibit for public viewing sa konggreso, sabay hirit ng isang papoging representante na ito’y “horror” show with “ugly performers”?  the shame’s on you, macho pigs!

this is not to say that i am with #everywoman who “would like to testify in congress” because “it was me in the sex video.”

The hashtag #everywoman on Friday trended in various social media platforms, less to support embattled Senator Leila de Lima and more about taking a stand against gendered attacks launched by certain statesmen.

“gendered attack”???  kung lalaki si de lima, and accused of screwing around with his lady driver allegedly picking up money from criminal gangs in bilibid for his benefit, and there were a sex video of the couple, gagamitin din ‘yan nina alvarez for sure, unless of course the male version of de lima were smart enough to remain calm, cool, and collected, innocent until proven guilty.  i mean, you know, like, vp binay never lost his temper, ever, in the face of all provocation, while de lima in her last presscon was reduced to a screaming banshee, auguring the end of whatever.

the lady doth protest too much when she could be building a defense that will stand up in court.