Category: social media

#TeamChiz

What I hate most about political vlogs, whether anti-DDS and/or anti-BBM, is the laughter — canned and līve — na para bang ginagawang katawa-tawa lang ang matitinding problema ng bayan. Ang daming dapat pagtuunan ng pansin na puwedeng itulak as election issues, kahit man lang the China issue — given Trump, kanino ba sila at bakit — and of course the anti-dynasty provision of the Constitution that Congress has been ignoring, shrugging off, since 1987, and so now we have five more Tulfos running… The impeachment as issue is pure distraction. It will happen in good time.

The good, the bad, the petty: Chiz and the Sara impeachment #SocialMediaDiscourse
Katrina S.S.

I do not doubt that there is a whole lot of reasons to continue discussing the impeachment of VP Sara Duterte, specifically whether it is right or wrong that Senate President Chiz Escudero is doings things at his own pace, and whether that puts the whole impeachment at risk and / or risking the possibility of getting an acquittal for VP Sara. I tend to think that SP Escudero is far smarter than all of this. He’s not new to this circus, and certainly has engaged long enough with politics in this country to know not to put even his own political career at risk by a failure to thoughtfully and carefully flesh things out, anticipate outcomes, adjust as things unfold.

And if your biases against Escudero don’t cloud your judgment, he actually made a lot of sense at that February 20 press con, talking about how the Senate, in fact, is taking the necessary steps it can take at this point in time, owing to the fact that the Senate is not in session, and many Senators are busy campaigning either for another term in office, or for other elective positions. He is firm in the refusal to rush the proceedings, or to call a session, and denies either side of the political spectrum to pressure him into doing or saying anything: “I will not dignify nor listen to partisan legal opinions or positions for or against the impeachment of VP Sara.”

At this point in our political discourse, that pretty much gives Escudero the license to ignore everyone. For good or bad, partisanship is the rule these days, not the exception.

And this surfaces in the most simple of ways. Say, the superficiality of discourse that will, by default, mention what Escudero looks like as opposed to what it is he is saying. The worst part is that this kind of pettiness exists across the vlogging spectrum—from the Duterte supporters, to the ones who insist they are better “than those vloggers”. All of them, across the board, frame their conversations about Escudero’s (in)actions relative to what he looks like—Heydarian constantly cracks jokes about microblading, Llamas insists the white shirt is about Escudero wanting to “show off” his “boobs”, Esguerra asks: naka-white shirt ba? in reference to Escudero. Meanwhile, Duterte supporters are calling out Escudero for wearing that shirt, too, insisting that it is disrespectful of his position, as is his earring. On Facebook and YouTube, a superficial search on Escudero will surface content that tags him in relation to his eyebrows.

It is undeniable that this is the state of political discourse in this country, one that remains as counterpoint to mainstream media, where there remains a sense of what good interviews are about, and what political analysis still is. That is: not petty or superficial, not at all about what people look like.

Oh but liberal macho punditry knows no bounds, and revelling in the freedom of social media platforms, they can use the same kinds of tools the vloggers on the Duterte side use. Say, using a tone of arrogance in speaking to our government officials, always certain about what should be done, and almost ordering politicians around: this is what you should do. And any politician who decides otherwise was just scared, or “dinaga”. Because how else to explain that their punditry was ignored?

But given the tone and tenor of this kind of political analysis, I can imagine politicians not just ignoring what is being said across the spectrum of liberal-Duterte vloggers; I can imagine them deliberately and pointedly refusing to do what is being said by these critics and vloggers and pundits and analysts.

In a February 21 episode of Facts First, after framing the discussion of Escudero’s press conference on the impeachment trial in what he was wearing, Esguerra labelled it as “konting katuwaan lang.”

This is what they need to get. When the liberal “katuwaan” is exactly the same as the “katuwaan” that’s done by the Duterte side, then that makes for dominant social media discourse. It doesn’t matter if it’s a fraction of what you do, neither does it matter if you do it to everyone—you do it at scale, all the time, every time, the small things become normalized. We should all know this by now after six years under Duterte.

Is a sense of humor unwelcome? No, but real political humor is a skill set, and not one that these guys have. This is not humor, it’s empty laughter. It’s laughter that sacrifices what is intelligent and critical, for what is small and petty. And while we expect this from the Duterte side who are grasping at straws, and will really stoop so low as to talk about what people look like as opposed to what it is people say, the rest of us on the purportedly “better” “more critical” side, should know better.

“Meron pa ‘kong standing invitation kay Senator Chiz,” Esguerra said, after Llamas framed the conversation on the Senate President’s white t-shirt.

May the Senate President know better than to ever say yes to that interview. He doesn’t need it. ***

It’s a crazy planet

My YouTube algorithm is dominated by posts on the INC-DDS-KOJC rally, the Los Angeles wildfires, the Tulfo takedown, and the Pepsi challenge.

The rally. Two million daw ang darating sa Lunes. Kahit pa pinagtatalunan pa rin kung pro-BBM ba o pro-Sara ang Iglesia. Ang malinaw lang ay: puro sila anti-impeachment. And the DDS are making a big deal of the suspension of classes in Manila and Pasay, and the transfer of venue from Liwasang Bonifacio to the Luneta Grandstand. Ibig daw sabihin, anti-impeachment and pro-peace talaga ang presidente. Sey naman ng iba, hindi, inilalayo lang niya sa palasyo ang rally, in case magkagulo.

The wildfires.  Does Trump get the message? He has called climate change a hoax, refusing to recognize environmental dangers, instead blaming his political opponents for the rising frequency of natural disasters or proclaiming them to be acts of God. He has promised to drill for more oil and cut back on renewable energy. https://apnews.com Last month he warned the EU that it must buy more U.S. oil and gas or else face tariffs. https://www.usnews.com What’s it going to take kayâ to make him see that it’s time to battle climate change, better late than never.

The takedown. The Erwin aka Erich Tulfo account of his long stay in the U.S. is revealed to be full of holes. Nag-TNT ba siya o nag-enlist sa U.S. Army? Kung TNT, ibig sabihin ay wala siyang dokumento; kung nag-enlist, ibig sabihin nakapagpapeke siya ng dokumento. Ano ba talaga? Walang katapusang “diskarte”? At totoo ba ang mga lumalabas na di kanais-nais na kuwento, di-umano, tungkol sa Tulfo brand? Huwag daw iboto?

The challenge.  Tama naman si Richard Heydarian https://www.youtube.com It was controversial, and it was tragic: let’s hear the perspective of women and other victims of abuse in showbiz history and culture. It’s about time, too. Beyond current issues of freedom of expression and right to privacy, there was prevailing then a low regard for starlets who dared bare their skin, in effect, thereby, allegedly, subliminally, inviting male advances, never mind consent. Martial law pa man din. There was just no keeping track of the case, thanks to controlled media. Next thing we knew, case withdrawn na. Nagkápatawarán na daw.

 

DDS vloggers are no “mosquito press”

DDS opinionators are peddling the notion that their social media vloggers (video bloggers) are today’s mosquito press, and even more powerful than the original because of the much wider reach of the internet’s platforms for disseminating info and opinions. The message to DDS vloggers and followers being, let’s not stop, we’re on the right track, people are watching and liking and sharing our posts, let’s engage and organize and hold rallies, and if we keep it up, we can oust the son just like we did the father.

But Joe Burgos’s mosquito press of martial law times that, after Ninoy’s assassination, was boosted and  amplified by Eggie Apostol’s and other anti-Marcos publications, was also purely anti-Marcos, totally focused on the struggle to end the dictatorship. And that’s what made it a powerful force in support of the widow Cory’s campaign to unseat Marcos.

Contrarily, the social media platforms — Facebook, Twitter, Tiktok, and YouTube — where anti-Marcos DDS vloggers proliferate, abound, too, with vloggers of different persuasions and politics, i.e., pro-Marcos anti-DDS as well as anti-Marcos and anti-DDS vloggers, many of whom are pro-Leni pro-Risa pro-Bam pro-Kiko pro-Leila, even pro- and anti-Tulfos.

Sa madaling salita, social media is a marketplace of ideas, even, a megamall of tsismis, everybody welcome, kanya-kanyang agenda, walang isang adbokasya o mensahe na bumebenta sa nakararami, except perhaps freedom of expression, and fake news.

Besides, in Feb 1986 the mosquito press was just a part of the Cory-led multi-sectoral opposition immersed in a 10-day Marcos crony boycott that saw banks running and the economy reeling. And VP Sara is certainly nothing like Cory.

“Storm in a teacup” #SaraDrama

Nov 23.  “Don’t worry about my safety. I have talked to a person and I said, if I get killed, go kill BBM [Marcos], [First Lady] Liza Araneta, and [Speaker] Martin Romualdez. No joke. No joke.”

Nov 25.  “Di ba pumalag nga ang buong bayan nang pinatay ng pamilya nila si Benigno Aquino Jr. (Didn’t the people fight back when they plotted the assassination of Benigno Aquino Jr.)?”

Nov 26.  “Ang hindi lang nagawa ni Ninoy … kaya hindi siya nakaganti … kasi hindi siya nagbilin. … But you know Benigno Aquino Jr. is not Sara Duterte. Ibang tao siya. Ibang tao din ako.”

All that from VP Sara in the run-up to November 27, when Ninoy would have turned 92, were he not assassinated by the Marcos military in broad daylight @ 50, just when he was finally of age to run for president under the Marcos constitution.

Few doubted that the dictator Marcos was the mastermind, simply because, like Cory said, once martial law was declared, nothing ever happened to Ninoy without the dictator’s approval, nothing! No one, Ver least of all, would have dared touch Ninoy without clearance from on high. It was also said that the dictator needn’t have given the order directly, that is, not in so many words, but merely indicated his wishes in other ways, perhaps a la Henry II in TS Eliot’s Murder in the Cathedral: as in, who will rid me of this troublesome one… or some such similar expression of grim exasperation.

The Marcos camp has always denied that Marcos was the mastermind, but anyone who bothers to check out credible documented reports and court rulings and docus knows that the Marcoses and their allies are lying or simply don’t know the truth just because, let us remember, the OG Marcos was wily that way.  And now that the son has made it back to the Palace, thanks to the Dutertes, the one time napag-usapan ang Ninoy assassination was in the time of Imee‘s movie Martyr or Murderer (2023) where a lot of screen time was still spent “trying to establish Ferdinand, Sr.’s innocence with regard to the Aquino assassination.”

BUTCH FRANCISCO: Was that still necessary? Through the years, the nation seems to have been convinced that Ferdinand, Sr. had nothing to do with Ninoy’s death. A comedic scene in Martyr that shows chief household staff Elizabeth Oropesa playing detective summarizes what had become the scenario in the public mind – yes, the one that involves a blood relation as the mastermind behind Ninoy’s killing. https://www.pikapika.ph/

Yes, it was still necessary, it will always be necessary. ‘Ika nga ni Imelda, perception is real, truth is not — but only in her world. Perception of innocence that is based on lies has to be periodically reinforced, otherwise the believers are confronted with nothing but the truth.

The truth that VP Sara dared speak, salamat na rin, and thankfully not to paint herself as a Ninoy, because she’s nothing like Ninoy. Her claim of death threats I can believe, but her conditional death can’t be automatically attributed to the Marcoses without investigation and confirmation.

PBBM, to his credit, has been very measured in his responses, even if he seems to have flipflopped from palaban to pa-statesman.

PRESIDENTIAL COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Nov 25 

The President said Duterte should be made accountable for her statements. Any assassination attempt against the President also raises concerns about the security of the nation and its citizens, he said.

Such criminal attempts should never be overlooked, the President added.

“Kung ganun na lang kadali ang pagplano sa pagpatay ng isang Presidente, papaano pa kaya ang mga karaniwan na mamayan? ‘Yang ganyang criminal na pagtatangka ay hindi dapat pinapalampas,” he said.

Interestingly echoing the people’s sentiments in 1983: “If he can do it to Ninoy, he can do it to any of us.”

Three days later,  Nov 28, as the Left and pinklawan social media pundits urged, nay, demanded, that Congress impeach the VP, now na! this purported message from “BBM” to Congress was leaked to media.

In the larger scheme of things, Sara is unimportant. So please do not file impeachment complaints. It will only distract us from the real work of governance which is to improve the lot of all Filipinos.

Today, the 29th, PBBM acknowledged sending the message and reiterated:

What will happen if someone files an impeachment? It will tie down the House [of Representatives], it will tie down the Senate, it will just take up time and for what? For nothing,” he added.

“None of this will help improve a single Filipino life,” he stressed. “As far as I’m concerned, it is a storm in a teacup.” https://philstarlife.com

Ang tanong, magpapapigil ba ang Konggreso? And will there be similar messages to the DOJ and the NBI to let the VP be? As in, dedma na lang? And let the people power attempt die a natural death?

The Left would be so disappointed, and maybe the DDS peeps daily gathering in EDSA, too, who seem to think that impeachment is what will bring huge crowds of Duterte supporters to the streets. But but but what fueled the huge rallies of 1986 was Cory’s nonviolent civil disobedience campaign and the wildly successful boycott of crony businesses that primed the people to stand as barricades and shield the military rebels from Marcos’s wrath. Parang this one is, has, nothing like that.

And then again, who knows. Here’s hoping BBM’s right and the “storm in a teacup” subsides quickly enough. If so, here’s to a viable tandem who can beat Sara and/or  Raffy Tulfo in 2028.