upsilon upset

read Destroying a myth by domini torrevillas.  i’m not sure what myth is being destroyed.  perhaps the myth that upsilon is still the best?

I’m still savoring the taste and mirth of the recently concluded successful 100th year celebration of Upsilon Sigma Phi which was attended by more than half of the entire membership of the fraternity from all over the world.  But alas, even before the last lights were turned off or before the last hurrah was said,  a dark sinister  move was ensuing.  A private online chat of  two or three of the newly minted student Upsilonians, still not fully socialized to the fraternity ways and traditions, was maliciously hacked and thrown open for everybody to read in cyber space. Admittedly the contents of the chat are horrible, reprehensible and condemnable: misogynistic views, racial slurs, anti Muslim, anti gays and lesbians. Even the resident Upsilonians were shocked and angry that such kind of behavior or thinking exists in the fraternity.  They immediately condemned the abhorrent conversation and asked for disciplinary actions.

The Diliman head of Upsilon known as Illustrious Fellow, Girard Sirios, was understandably upset.  Considering that this chat was hacked and considering further that this is an era of fake news, he wanted to ferret out the truth himself. Has the conversation been enhanced or made to appear worse than what it was? For him every member is precious and he is not about to throw the student brods to the angry crowd crying for blood. If all were said and correctly quoted, they should be answerable  for their acts. But this would be glorifying the hacker who committed the criminal act and whose aim is to destroy or malign Upsilon, which the Illustrious Fellow vowed to protect.  On another thought,  can anyone be so angry at the whole world or is this a case of mental disorder?

medyo convoluted.  but let me pick it apart.  so.  is illustrious fellow girard sirios investigating it at all?  tatlo nga lang bang mga bagets ang involved?  incorrectly quoted ba sila o correctly, as in, walang labis walang kulang?  i hear the thread started in march and that periodically it would turn evil.  i hear also that some senior brods were part of the thread.  why did they allow it to go on?

Maria Jovita Zárate may part nga sa chat na may sumaling senior brod. “mga brod, kung may kailangan kayo nasa Quezon Hall lang ako…” most incriminating. identified na yata kung sino yun. official family of Pres Concepcion who is an upsilonian.

Stuart Santiago  they are complicit then.

they should all be expelled from the frat, at the very least.  they should all be expelled from UP, at the very best.

Carol P Araullo Simple lang naman. Identify the ones who posted, expel them from UP and if the Upsilon really wants to recover its credibility, expel them from the frat. Upsilon should make a public statement acknowledging the grievous infraction of every principle UP holds dear, (in fact, of everything a decent, sensible, respectful human being should uphold), apologize to the individuals, groups and sectors maligned and threatened, and GROVEL for understanding and forgiveness by their victims and the UP community at large.

yes, *GROVEL*

but but but.  the upsilon thinking, if we are to take it from torrevillas, is that if guilty, the culprits should indeed be “answerable,” EXCEPT THAT, that daw would be “glorifying the hacker who committed the criminal act and whose aim is to destroy or malign Upsilon, which the Illustrious Fellow vowed to protect.”

so: hacking is a crime, and that’s the only wrong that needs righting, the only sin that needs punishing?  but the original sin was that horrible online chat.  for all we know it was exposed, not by a rival frat hacker with intent to take down upsilon, but by a lonsi lurker with intent to rock the boat and rid the frat of these dregs.

besides, mr illustrious fellow, can protecting upsilon, and being complicit in that offensive drivel, be more correct and appropriate and honorable than standing up for the women, muslims, lgbtqs, lumad, and the memory of cory and ninoy that your boys felt free to demean insult malign just because they thought no one was listening except like-minded brods?  that’s the message upsilon is sending, guys, in case hindi niyo alam.

“On another thought,  can anyone be so angry at the whole world or is this a case of mental disorder?”

again i’m not sure.  who’s torrevillas referring to: the bad boys of upsilon or the hacker?  pero gusto ko yung “is this a case of mental disorder?”  umabot talaga tayo sa mental disorder as a defense?  parang puwede mag-plead ng insanity?  mygad.  why not.  yung tipong psychotic na split personality.  which might also explain why their values are a mess.

read men sta. ana’s Upsilon’s progressive legacy (or why Upsilon should not be associated with Marcos)

During the course of its centennial celebration, the fraternity, which takes pride in striving for leadership, has not given any public recognition to Marcos, the only Philippine president it can claim. Wenceslao Q. Vinzons, a fighter for independence, and a true war hero (unlike Marcos who had to burnish his reputation with fake medals), has become Upsilon’s model. The fraternity has likewise honored fellows — the living and the dead — for their significant contributions in different fields and disciplines. But Marcos is excluded. (Other Upsilonian politicians, even the good ones like Ninoy Aquino, have likewise been excluded from receiving recognition during the centennial celebration. Perhaps, this is the tradeoff to prevent Marcos from being recognized.)

imagine.  wenceslao vinzons as model.  ninoy aquino not good enough, guys?  or maybe too recent?  lol.  but seriously, what is so great about a fraternity that won’t can’t stand up for what is right because for the longest time, marcos and government connections came first.  where was brotherhood nang ikulong ni big brod marcos si kid brod ninoy nang mahigit pitong taon.  what does it say about the frat that to this day refuses to acknowledge ninoy aquino as hero.  marcos loyalists still rule?

Maria Jovita Zárate for teachers of the social sciences and cultural studies, that long thread spanning the months of March to November is a fecund material for some intense close reading, a discourse analysis that might just unpack the web of power relations—frat and university community, frat and special sectors of that community, senior brod and junior brod, brods within Quezon hall and outside of Quez Hall. As a teacher I would grab that opportunity as a teachable moment, and probably end with a walk-through in the academic oval where the “illustrious” history of the organization is represented in those kitschy tarps.

“illustrious” my foot.  upsilon has long lost its glow.  about time for a case study: of upsilon’s rise and fall.

Bonifacio: ‘Fear history’

Andres Bonifacio’s letters that have come out of the woodwork have rekindled popular interest in the hero, who left us only with a faded photograph and a small collection of writings, and all to the good.

His letter to Emilio Jacinto on April 24, 1897, one of the three original letters that came from the collection of Epifanio de los Santos and were auctioned in March, reads like a page from a whodunit novel, both riveting and unsettling.

Read on…

ninoy aquino on my blog

on ninoy’s 86th birthday, sharing some posts over 10 years of blogging about a beloved hero.  those who continue to say that if he had not been assassinated he would have turned out to be just another traditional politician… they are wrong.  read nick joaquin’s The Aquinos of Tarlac: An Essay of History As Three Generations (1983).  ninoy was coming from somewhere else, and he had a vision for nation.  unfortunately, as it turned out, cory the cojuangco could only do so much (to put it kindly).

in defense of ninoy 
joma sison, plaza miranda, ninoy aquino
noise barrage 1978: first People Power show 
Carmen Guerrero Nakpil on the death of Ninoy Aquino
ninoy and the hacienda
Ninoy Aquino and the Rise of People Power
ninoy’s LP would have welcomed satur and liza 
beyond conspiracy: ninoy’s politics 
ninoy’s politics: “Three Generations” 
ninoy’s politics: “The Filipino As Dissident” 
ninoy’s politics: “A Christian Democratic Vision” 
ninoy’s politics: “Manifesto for a Free Society”
ninoy, 21 August 83  
ninoy’s killers (updated) 
wearenotninoy

kris, and imelda, on our minds

i’m in the middle of putting together a ninoy bio but kris and imelda in the news at the same time — amazing synchronicities all around — calls for a blogging break.

kris is screaming theft.  “tens of tax paid millions from my sons’ trust funds,” she said in sept 25.  ayun pala some P1.2 M lang, in credit card charges pa, that the accused is perfectly willing to pay, as on previous occasions.  what’s going on, kris?  magkano ba talaga?  tapos, may pa-threat-threat ka pa daw?

JESUS FALCIS:  I heard it personally.  Ms Aquino threatened  my brother.
You f*cking asshole!  Nick, wag ka tatapak dito sa Pilipinas.  Dare to step in this country and you will be dead.

parang the level of anger is O.A.  isn’t she relieved na nagkamali siya, hindi pala tens of millions ang nawawala, as she thought at first?  might this be a more complicated case, with aggravating pangs of unrequited something-something, as in, a woman scorned?  if not, fine.  if yes, well, yes, P1.2M is P1.2M, lalo na if the guy led her on, or something like that.  but i don’t know.  it feels like a publicity stunt to me.  a running publicity stunt, maybe all the way to 2022?  who knows with these crazy rich women.

which brings me to imelda, who has been found guilty of seven charges of graft while in office back in the good old bad days of martial law.  loyalists are asking why has it taken so long to prove her guilt, 27 years, what about her right to a speedy trial?  say ko naman, it’s not as if the marcoses weren’t paying their big time lawyers to delay and delay and delay, maybe until a marcos-friendly supreme court happens along, presumably if/when bongbong manages to reclaim the palace?

loyalists are also saying that at 89 imelda’s too old to go to jail.  kay digong ko una narinig ito, early in his presidency.

President Rodrigo Duterte said that prisoners who are at least 70 years old should be released from prison, according to the law. And since he’s already 71 years old, he can no longer be jailed.

but wait.  atty raymond fortun begged to disagree.

… litigation lawyer Raymond Fortun said that Duterte thought wrong about being safe from imprisonment because of his advanced age.

“With all due respect to the President, he is wrong here,” Fortun said in his Facebook post.

“Age is merely a MITIGATING circumstance (Art. 13, Sec 2, RPC). It does NOT mean that he cannot be charged and, if found convicted, cannot service his sentence in jail. Being 70 years of age merely reduces the penalty to its minimum (or, if there are other mitigating circumstances, by 1 to 2 degrees lower),” he said.

iyan rin ang sabi ni atty noel del prado sa usapang de campanilla on dzmm kanina.  as for the health issue —  she’s suffering from “multiple organ infirmities” and  “under strict orders to refrain from stressful conditions” — medyo mahirap ang excuse slip na ganyan kapag nakaka-four terms ka na sa konggreso, at may balak ka pang tumakbo for governor sa 2019.

i imagine though that imee, bongbong, and irene will move heaven and earth to spare their matriarch, and i get it.  in their place, i would probably do the same.