Keithley’s recourse

Manila Standard 23 Dec 1991

It was quite a story pieced together by June Keithley of the novice Teresing Castillo and the Carmel nuns of Lipa, of visitations by the devil and by a lady in white, of rose petals materializing, falling, from thin air, bringing miraculous cures. A story suppressed by Philippine church officials for 40 years, now out in the open, picking up where it left off, the same lady appearing anew and roses raining down from nowhere.

Given the Christian myths on which we were raised, it is difficult to ignore the visionary Teresing and to remain unimpressed by the apparently super powers of her Lady, Mediatrix of All Grace. However, the Lady’s message, calling for all Christians to reconcile and pray the rosary, is difficult to take seriously. As is usual with Marian apparitions, the suggestion is that only Christians will be saved, in particular, Christians who accept Mary and the rosary, which isn’t quite in the spirit of post-Vatican II ecumenism.

And so, while half-believing Teresing’s story, I find it does not make me any less doubtful of the Church’s version of God, life and death. And I can only wonder anew where, when, whom Marian messages might be issuing from, and what these could mean not only for Roman Catholics but for humanity as a whole.

My favorite theory attributes Marian apparitions to a future time and civilization – when time travel is already a reality – from which vantage advanced minds are trying to tell us something, something mankind needs to know or do that perhaps might change the course of events, perhaps to improve our chances of averting disasters, natural or nuclear.

I imagine that these advanced minds would be sending the same message all around the globe, but using different images and symbols,depending on the spiritual condition of a target population. The message, always, seems to have to do with the power of, and need for more, prayer and meditation, an activity in all religions. The desired effect could be a tuning together of critical human energies in a single wavelength – Muslims, Jews, and Christians together with Buddhists and yogis, TM freaks and Zen masters – and so attaining to otherwise unattainable powers of human consciousness?

Praying the rosary (like meditating on a mantra, a mandala, movement, or the breath) slows down brain waves from 32 – 14 cycles per second to below 14, meaning a shift from an ego-centered rational state of mind to a meditative / reflective state which soothes and renews the physical body while lifting the mind to a state of oneness with other minds and, possibly, with all of humanity.

But Keithley fails to explore the modern implications of a Marian apparition. The heroine of EDSA gets herself mired at the level of church politics and gets no farther than a church investigation. Keithley is so intrigued, and so involved, and just like Keithley, she wallows. She has a good story up her sleeve but she tends to weave too much of her ego and emotions into the telling, and so obscures rather than helps clarify matters.

It doesn’t help that The Keithley Report is a one-woman show, practically a solo act, produced and directed, written and anchored, by her one and only self. For such an important series Keithley should consider getting creative help. Film is a complex medium; two, three heads are always better than one. And it’s time she gave up anchoring (unless she’s willing to be directed); her delivery is awfully distracting: self-conscious, over-dramatic and cloying. As for her looks, well, it shouldn’t matter except she asked for it when she struck that silly pose (favoring her right side) for the entire show.

A little less ego, a little more post-production, and The Keithley Report would be world-class. Surely that’s worth some sacrifice? Praise the Lord! I mean, the lady. I mean, Keithley.

A matter for Buddy, attention Ducky

Manila Standard 1 Nov 1991

Whatever the scenario in 1992 – elections or no elections – Uncle Sam is sure to intervene in our political affairs. The objective: to get pro-bases people into Malacañang Palace and Congress in one fell swoop, the quicker to reverse the senate ruling on the bases treaty and the better to ensure the stay of US military forces in Subic all the way to forever.

Anti-bases people have their work cut out for them: a bases-information campaign to reinforce the anti-bases sentiment that has begun to take hold in the hearts and minds of thinking Filipinos, and also to counter US propaganda claiming that majority of Filipinos remain pro-bases (meaning, intervention is justified).

Ideally it is government, in particular, the Executive department, that should be conducting a bases-information campaign. But having taken a pro-bases line, the Executive can hardly be expected to countenance anything but pro-bases propaganda; not even if, back in July 1990, Press Secretary Tomas “Buddy” Gomez promised on live television (9, Tell the People) that an “objective” info campaign was in the works.

But those were the days when Mrs. Aquino’s options were still open, and Secretary Gomez must really have been trying to come up with something to satisfy both the pros and antis.

Not incidentally, those were also the last days of Noel Garth Tolentino as press undersecretary and director-general of the Philippine Information Agency (PIA). Supremely confident that Malacañang would go anti-bases (a la Health Secretary Alfredo Bengzon), Tolentino made the mistake of preparing an unabashedly anti-bases campaign in February 1990, in time for the exploratory talks. Of course it was rejected by Malacañang, and I suspect that it’s what cost him his job. By November he was out.

For my part, as the writer commissioned by Tolentino to plan and write the materials for the proposed multi-media campaign, I was prepared to be objective. But Tolentino was adamant, he had the primary messages all thought out: one, niloko tayo ng Kanô; two, kaya natin mag-isa; three, kailangan nating maghanda.

Mostly I organized the information into modules, each focusing on a particular bases issue: extent, duration, jurisdiction, compensation, nuclear weapons, AIDS, etc., tracing how each arose and how the Americans responded through the years, from the 1890s to the 1990s. Also I turned out several slogans for stickers and buttons, billboards and streamers; several scripts for radio andTV spots / teasers; a script for a mini-docu; a primer on the bases, for print / leaflets; and translated into Filipino a history of the US bases in the Philippines, for serializing in comics spreads. To collaborate with Fred Llongoren on the comics materials, I called in Iskho Lopez (my on-and-off editor), and he turned out, besides, a couple of poems and script for a film commercial. All of the above duly approved by Tolentino. In charge of production was Leo Martinez, Tolentino’s creative consultant, who had recommended me for the job.

Alas, Leo didn’t get farther than demo tapes of some radio spots, which I suppose was all the Palace needed to say no. And, alas, I am still trying to collect my fee, so I can pay Iskho (so he can pay Domingo Landicho, the poet, who sent in a few verses).

First I was told that Tolentino and Bengzon were still trying to raise funds from private sources. Then I was told that my check was ready but the Commission on Audit was auditing the Tolentino administration’s finances so no checks were being released. Later, I was told that my appointment papers had been sent to the Department of Budget and Management for approval and were stuck there.

Incensed, I wrote to the Officer-in-Charge of PIA, a Paul Alvarez, to complain. I pointed out that my appointment was for two months only, meaning, it didn’t need the approval of the CSC, and that I had done work for PIA before and never encountered any such problem. I intimated that perhaps I was being punished for being anti-bases?

In November I received a response: a phone call from no less than Press Undersecretary Horacio “Ducky” Paredes, whom I had met once, some ten years ago. He came on like an old friend, eager to help out, explaining that there was nothing political about the stopping of my check, only that Tolentino had so juggled funds, they were still straightening things out. He asked for a little time, till the end of the year. Come Christmas I called to remind him. He wouldn’t even come to the phone.

That was a whole year ago. Since then – against all odds, despite Cory’s and the US government’s pro-bases propaganda, despite Pinatubo and the economy’s dire need for aid, despite amboys Dick Gordon, Sonny Osmeñá, Joey Lina, Tito Sotto, and Joey de Leon – the Senate has ruled on the bases, the Terrific Twelve saying NO to the proposed treaty. I was so high, I forgave and forgot Tolentino and Paredes.

One year or three years to withdraw, it almost doesn’t seem to matter (given how long we’ve waited), so long as the withdrawal process is irreversible. And if the Terrific Twelve, along with Luis Taruc, Solita Monsod, Renato Constantino Jr., JoeCon, and others like them, were to run and / or go all out to campaign for anti-bases candidates come 1992, tiyak, may tulog ang Kanô.

Pakendengkendeng pa si Kulas

Diyaryo Filipino 9 Mar 1990

Bow ang beauty ko sa kalawang macho ng Pinoy TV: si Atty Jose Mari Velez ng Velez This Week sa Siyete, at si Leo Martinez ng Mongolian Barbecue sa Trese, na kaytatapang pala’t kaylalakas ng loob. Wala silang takot sa Kanô, e ano kung i-blacklist sila ng US embassy at mga kumpanyang multinasyonal, okey lang sa kanila. Mas mahalaga kasi ang sariling bayan, at kailangan nang manindigan, kundi hindi’y iisahan, lalamangan, lolokohin na naman tayo ng mga banyaga.

Umeksena si Martinez bilang kongresistang “anti” o kontra sa US bases. Inip na inip na siyang mapaalis ang mga base militar sabay mapalayas ang mga “Yankee ng ina nila” na ang trato raw sa ating bayan ay timpong kerida lamang(isa sa marami) na mukhang pinagsasawaan na, na hindi na kasi singyaman at singyumi ng dati – kaya lalo pang binabarat – pero ayaw namang bumitaw nang tuluyan. Saan nga naman sila makakatagpo ng isa pang bayang kayganda na ng lokasyon ay kaydali pang utuin – kahit sa kondisyong “unhampered military operations” ay pumapayag!

“Irreverent” ang banat ni Kinatawan Leo; kung pagtawanan at lait-laitin ang Kano ay ganoon na lang – tipong mas matindi, mas mainam – inawitan pa nga niya ng Andyan ka na naman… a la Gary Valenciano. Totoo, di ba, andyan na naman sila, poporma-porma na naman,pakendengkendeng, ipinangangalandakan ang kanilang datung at lakas-militar, baka kasi nakakalimutan natin.

Kaya tamang tama rin ang ang drama ni Atty. Velez noong Huwebes, noong nag-one-on-one sila ni US Ambassador Nicolas Platt tungkol sa mga base militar. Kakaiba sa dati ang dating ni Velez, wala yung pagbubusisis maya’t maya sa lapat ng amerikana niya, at wala rin yung pasulyap-sulyap sa TV monitor para tiyaking oks ang itsura niya, tipong nakalimutan ang sarili, masyado kasi ang pagkakapako ng kanyang atensiyon sa pinagsasabi ng Kanô, sabay ismid at taas ng dalawang kilay.

Siyempre wala namang sinabing bago si Platt dahil ganyan talaga ang estilo ng Embahador, maingat na maingat, pilingpili ang salita, nang di malagay sa alanganin ang pamahalaang Bush at, gayon din, nang di lalong uminit ang ulo ng Pinoy, nang mahimasmasan, ika nga.

Ngunit pinahirapan siya ni Velez. Hindi umubra kay Velez ang pa-epek ni Platt tungkol sa espesyal na ugnayan ng Amerika’t Pilipinas, halimbawa, at tungkol sa “best efforts” (talagang “best” na day yon, o) at kung anuano pang patutsadang lumang tugtugin na, kaya wa-epek na. Ang ginawa ni Velez ay tinutukan ng tanong si Kulas, hindi basta pinalusot ang mga palusot nito; panay ang hingi ni Velez ng higit na maliwanag na paliwanag, sabay giit sa pananaw ng Pinoy, sabay diin sa mga probisiyon sa kasunduang hindi pabor sa Pilipinas.

Binabawi ko ang sinabi ko noong isang linggo na wala na yatang tataray pa kay “Taas-kilay” Platt. Di hamak na mas matataray sina Velez at Martinez. Mabuhay sila!

Sugal gawing legal

Diyaryo Filipino Oct1989

Aliwan page din lang ito, pag-usapan natin ang iba pang aliwan ng Pinoy bukod sa pultika’t showbiz. Itong sugal, halimbawa, na pilit na ipinagbabawal ng batas. Sabi raw ni Senador Jovito Salonga, matapos i-aprub ng senado ang isang bill na naglalayong bumuwag sa lahat ng casino by 1992 (Globe Oct 14), “. . . Our nation can never achieve greatness unless we encourage our citizens to embrace the ethics of hard work, honest toil, self discipline and sacrifice – not the temptation of instant wealth . . .”

Hmmm. Ewan ko rin. Ako kasi ay nagsusugal paminsanminsan. Tatay ko ang nagturo sa aming magkakapatid ng larong mahjong, 13 yata ako noon. Sa asawa ko’t mga bayaw naman ako natutuong maglaro ng blackjack, pusoy, pekwa, poker, betobeto, high-and-low, at roulette, at sa Tiaong (Quezon) ako natutong tumaya sa jueteng. Dati madalas at malakas kaming magsugal magkakaanak (miron na lang si erpat), kung hindi mahjong, blackjack, naeeskandalo na nga si ermat dahil hindi naman kami pareparehong madadatung, no? Tapos ang dami na ring mga kai-kaibigang dumadayo, nabalitaang masaya’t malakas ang labanan, e di siyempre naiba na rin hung timpla, hindi na friendly, talutalo na. Di nagtagal, natauhan kaming mga misis at itinigil muna namin ang get-togethers. Ngayon, madalang at mahina na kaming magsugal, maliban kung nasa Baguio kami, hindi maiwasan yung casino, kahit sandali, trip lang, manalo o matalo.

Sa palagay ko, itong hilig at abilidad ng tao sa sugal ay depende sa karma ng bawat isa – merong mahilig, merong hindi. Tulad din ito ng hilig at abilidad sa sex, o sa musika, o sa sports, hindi basta-basta mapipigil, may sarili kasing puwersa, at nasa bawat isa kung hanggang saan pagbibigyan angudyok. At nasa sa karma rin yung malas o suwerte sa sugal. Meron talagang ipinanganganak na suwerte, mayroon namang malas, pagdating sa risk-taking, at mayroon ding pabawi lang parati. Siyempre, ang dumadayo madalas sa pasugalan ay yung suwerte’t pabawi, pero meron ding mas malas kaysa suwerte, at sila ang pinoproblema ng iglesiya’t simbahan, at ng mga moralista kuno.

Problema raw itong mga sugarol na nasisira ang ulo at buhay at pamilya dahil sa sugal, nawawalan kasi ng kontrol, pati pang pagkain ng pamilya’t pangmatrikula ng anak ay napapakialaman, umaasa kasing makakabawi,makakajackpot, makapag-uuwi ng lmpak-limpak na salapi, na bihirang mangyari, kaya merong nagpapakamatay, meron ding nagbebenta ng droga’t babae, makaipon lang nga pampuhunan. Sey ko naman, iilan ang nagkakaganyan, at karaniwan ay kabilang sila sa malalakas tumaya.

Higit na maraming Pinoy na sugarol ang marunong namang magdala, marunong umayaw, marunong matalo, okey lang, dahil hindi lang naman yung “instant wealth” ang habol nila kundi yun ding sarap at excitement ng mismong paglalaro. Libangan, ika nga, pagkatapos ng trabaho. Ewan ko kung bakit sila ang iniiiwas ng pamahalaan sa mumurahing dibersyon at pinagdadamutan ng kahit karampot na pag-asa.

Pustahan tayo, hindi uubra yang mga batas na yan. If anything, titindi lang lalo ang problemasa illegal gambling. Kung bakit kasi hindi pa gawing legal ang sugal. E di sana mareregulate at mamomonitor na ang mga pasugalan na tinatangkilik ng publiko. E di sana matitigil na ang pagdadatung ng gambling lords kung kanikanino, gobyerno na mismo ang dadatungan by paying taxes. E di may pag-asang mabawasbawasan ang ating kauutang at kapapalimos ng foreign aid. O di ba?