read raul palabrica’s Ominous precedent in the hight court, narciso reyes’s Supreme Court quandary, rene saguisag’s …cost of judicial independence, jose sison’s Wrong move, ana marie pamintuan’s Shortcuts, and elinando cinco’s If the impending Sereno impeachment were a new- product launch, it sorely needs industry endorsements.
clearly, the solgen’s big idea (or was it the speaker’s) of asking the supreme court to remove cj sereno from her position via a quo warranto proceeding instead of letting her go through an impeachment trial is actually a very bad idea.
hindi bale sana if the supremes had stayed above the fray, distanced themselves from the lower-house impeachment hearings, as behooved them. then it would be a different story, then we would not be under the impression that the supremes would kick her out in a heartbeat if it were up to them, and that’s not fair. sereno deserves to be heard, must be given the opportunity to respond to accusations in the proper court, that is, the senate trial court. she was right to stay away from the snakepit, the cesspool? that is the lower-house.
hindi rin bale sana if we were not under the impression that the case against the chief justice is weak, or why else did the honorable reps need some seven months, over some 15 day-long hearings, to come up with something, anything, as in, best efforts ang peg? anyway it’s more a political rather than a judicial matter, the senate sitting as an impeachment court cannot NOT take into consideration that very powerful ones in the duterte admin want her out, full stop? by hook or by crook? no ifs or buts?
the “honorable” reps should stop appearing on tv, trying to convince us that the chief justice is as bad, as evil, as corrupt, even, as crazy, as they are, i mean, as they say she is. and media peeps should stop giving them airtime. they’ve had seven months. it’s the cj’s turn and we badly want to hear her defense, yes?
tama si cj, tapusin ng congress ang sinimulan nila. wag tayo pumayag na basta na lang sipain ng supremes si sereno. we need to hear her side, so we can all make up our minds who and what to believe. they made us suffer through 7 tortuous months of lower-house hearings, we deserve the closure that a senate trial will bring, whatever the outcome, for good or ill.
at the moment i’m not sold on the notion na walang panalo si sereno. na kahit hindi pa siya ma-convict sa senado di na siya makakabalik sa supreme court, that the damage to the institution would be reparable only if given a fresh start, without sereno. yeah, right, armed with a whole new set of precedents to judge by, how fresh is that.
of course the supreme appeal of the quo-warranto scheme was that it would save the lower house from the hard work of prosecuting the case vs. sereno in the senate. it would seem, however, that the “honorable” ones have recovered from that moment of weakness. the news is that former senate prez juan ponce enrile himself, who supported the midnight appointment of, then presided over the trial court that impeached, corona has joined the prosecution panel, woohoo, let the games begin.