i watched all five episodes of bikoy’s “Ang Totoong Narcolist” via facebook, and again all 5-in-1 via twitter. i thought it was well-done, not a slapdash affair, at walang paligoy-ligoy. i wondered, of course, how true the allegations were, are, and i hoped that, as promised in episode #5 late april, that he would come out soon, identify himself, and present his evidence in the proper venue.
now that he has, come out, the DDS “internet experts” have been, of course, on frenzied overdrive, first dissing his credibility, pointing out that he has a criminal record, we are crazy to believe his allegations against the duterte family and bong go et al, then insinuating that advincula isn’t really bikoy, but also that this is an old con by advincula, that once upon a time it was pNoy and co. that he was accusing of being drug lords or something like that, yet this time that it is the liberal party that’s behind bikoy, in a bid to discredit digong’s favored senator wannabe bong go, at kung anoano pa.
i have no problem with advincula having a criminal record. ika nga ni boom buencamino sa twitter:
“Natural. Alanganin naman na seminarista ang magtatrabaho sa sindikato, di ba? Kaya nga kapanipaniwala ang sinabi niya na empleyado siya ng sindikato, di ba?
indeed. kung hindi siya kriminal na nasangkot sa drug trade, paano niya malalaman, di umano, ang pasikot-sikot ng drug trade?
besides, i’ve always wondered, like many others, why duterte’s drug war insists on targetting small-time pushers and users — the bottom of the pyramid — and not the big-time suppliers and smugglers and druglords — the top of the pyramid. wannabe-senator bato de la rosa in the last cnn debate tried to justify this, saying na grabe na kasi ang drug problem natin, kaya dapat ratsada na, tamaan na ang lahat, rich and poor, top and bottom. but but but hindi naman iyan ang nangyayari. we have yet to see one from the top suffer as thousands from the bottom have.
to no one’s surprise, IBP will have nothing to do with bikoy, and the senate investigation ping lacson promised aint gonna happen ’cause bikoy’s allegations are all nonsense daw, ’cause the senate prez says so. read Man claiming to be ‘Bikoy’ tagged past admin’s execs to drugs, where sotto fleshes out the story hinted at by a DDS “internet expert” two nights ago on a facebook video. meanwhile panelo fleshes out the theory by another DDS “internet expert” that advincula isn’t bikoy of the videos, complete with voice analysis chuchu.
but seriously. speaking of credibility, how credible ba is tito sotto of #pepsipaloma and #antiRHplagiarism fame? sal panelo himself says, you lie in one, you lie in all, LOL. he would know, surely.
i would prefer to hear tito sotto’s story in a senate investigation where / when he is under oath to speak the truth and nothing but the truth, so help him god, the same as advincula. level the playing field, guys!
but wait, wala pang abogado si advincula. takot bang lahat kay digong? so paano na. ganoon na lang? case closed? lusot na naman? WHAT.A.SHAME!!!
Baka nasa matrix ka na rin ni Duterte.
ikaw rin?
RAISSA ROBLES: “Dear Senator Sotto, why did 2 important details on whistleblower “Bikoy” change from your first press con to your second press con?”
https://www.raissarobles.com/2019/05/08/dear-senator-sotto-why-did-2-important-details-on-whistleblower-bikoy-change-from-your-first-press-con-to-your-second-press-con/
Leila DeLima was one of those who were quite excited about Bikoy, demanding that concerned government agencies should immediately investigate his claims. We have not heard from her since about the matter. I want to hear from her if he shares the view that it doesn’t matter if Bikoy has criminal records.
No lawyer for Advincula? Indeed, you should wonder why those rabid anti-Duterte personalities who were initially so elated about Bikoy have all too suddenly kept quiet. Takot sila? Don’t think so.
then why? if it’s not “takot”? please elaborate :))
teka, naisip ko rin si leila. kung ok lang na may criminal record si bikoy, e di ok din lang yung mga nag-testify against her na convicts. pero yung walang abogadong maglakas-loob to lawyer for bikoy… puwede ngang hindi dahil sa takot kundi…ang hirap? am i missing something here?
How about they realized too that Advincula is a fraud?
so if he’s a fraud, based on inside info, we’ll never know what the story is, who set him up etc. and the drug lords live happily ever after.
If he’s a fraud, it will certainly backfire big time on the opposition which initially fell for his story. Will they risk it?
But, hey, if someone insists on a Senate investigation, I think Lacson might just oblige.
too late? pinapaaresto na.
As for me, Bikoy lost me quickly. Not because of Bong’s bare back because tattoos could indeed be erased. It is this: how could a signature which is an exact mirror image of another signature in the same document be possible— and this is supposedly an authentic copy of a genuine original document?
good question, that i wish had been asked of him publicly.
TONY LA VINA: “Whether the IBP will reconsider its stance on representing Bikoy Advincula is up to it, but one thing remains certain—Bikoy Advincula has the right to be represented, and he can ask it from any lawyer or organization of lawyers he deems fit will defend him best. On the flip side of this, the IBP must make its own independent decision to defend or not defend a client.”
http://manilastandard.net/opinion/columns/eagle-eyes-by-tony-la-vina/294459/our-wonderful-ibp-leadership.html
[…] i said in overkilling bikoy, the 5-episode narcolist video was well done. the script went straight to the point, very […]