suspicious daw the timing of the supreme court decision denying the petition of vp leni robredo’s supporters that they be allowed to pay some 6 to 7M of the 15M total in electoral protest fees owed the presidential electoral tribunal (PET). read rina jimenez-david sa inquirer:
At this point in time almost all “eyeballs” are on the dispute between Commission on Elections Chair Andy Bautista and his estranged wife Patricia. In the heated exchange of accusations and counterclaims, including imputations of hidden wealth, an extramarital affair and the existence of a “third eye,” the name of Bongbong Marcos has cropped up, mainly because Ms Bautista’s lawyer is a good friend of the defeated vice-presidential candidate. Is the marital spat just a conflict between husband and wife? Or are Robredo, the Comelec and the conduct of the 2016 elections the ultimate targets? The timing is suspicious indeed.
i have family and friends who voted for leni, and who are indeed passionate about that win, and they wanted to send money, pero paano ba, tanong sa akin. kaninong bank account puwede magpadeposito, kilala mo ba ang mga iyan? so katrina asked a friend in the vp’s camp, and he referred us to the facebook page kung saan nakapost ang essential info.
but as it turns out, the law is quite clear about it, a public official may not cannot accept goodies of any kind:
Presidential Decree No. 46 prohibits public officials from receiving gifts or any other valuable thing on any occasion when the gift is given because of an official’s position, regardless of whether or not the gift is given for past favors, or if the giver is expecting to receive a favor or better treatment in the future.
The same prohibition against receiving gifts can also be found in Republic Act No. 6713, which specifies that prohibited gifts include those with a value that “is neither nominal nor insignificant.”
and yet and yet bongbong marcos was allowed to accept donations, in fact admitted that friends helped him raise 36M of the 60M total. napaka-unfair. bongbong is not a public official, kasi nga natalo siya ni leni, so he lodges a protest and forces leni to engage, tapos siya lang ang puwedeng humingi ng donations? but should PET rule in bongbong’s favor, what is to prevent those generous donors from exacting favors from the new veep? such interesting names, presumably donating in the millions, presumably with vested interests in a marcos vice presidency. next stop, malacañang?
in contrast, leni’s donors are anonymous citizens, across classes, who won’t be asking the vp any favors except precisely to fight this good fight. and in fairness, my sib and friends weren’t naive. alam nila na baka hindi pumayag ang PET, in which case okey lang sa kanila, let the money then go to the veep’s anti-poverty program, was the attitude.
i’m not sure what they’re thinking now, now that the incredible tish bautista has raised serious questions about the credibility of the 2016 elections. i’d be thinking, what if leni loses, bongbong as vp will get to use the money? umm, baka dapat iderecho na ang milyones sa home for the aged or somewhere like that. but wait, may motion for reconsideration pa daw. baka naman matauhan pa ang supremes.
if not, LP spokesman barry gutierrez says the robredo camp will be raising the money instead. the liberal party to the rescue? bakit ngayon lang.