Category: cha-cha

“be outraged”*

‘yung nagsasabing O.A. naman tayong mga nanggagalaiti over the railroading of HR 1109 kagabi…   yung nagsasabing fear-mongers tayo, we’re spreading fear when there’s nothing to be afraid of, yet, wala pa namang proposals, isn’t this daw the essence of democracy, tyranny of the majority that wants to talk con-ass…   say  pa, ayaw lang kasi natin sa chacha, ni ayaw nating pag-usapan o pag-isipan, mas type daw kasi natin ang tyranny of fear…

interesting spin.   creative, actually.   it would put me on the defensive if i didn’t know better.   it’s not as if we don’t know what these proposals are.   unang una, tiyak, is the deleting of economic provisions that limit foreign ownership of lands and industries, may resolution na ngang nakahanda si nograles, HR737…   i bet the bastusang pambansa will try and sneak in or force through a con-ass session to test HR1109 and pass 737 as soon as politically doable, i suppose as soon as 3/4 of the votes have been bought, i mean, assured.   perhaps last night was a dry-run.

even dilg secretary ronnie puno is talking now of gma running for congress in pampanga sa 2010 as if it were the most natural thing in the world.   i wouldn’t be surprised should the bastusang pambansa acting as constituent assembly engineer in august or september (if not sooner) a shift from presidential to parliamentary to set the stage for prime minister gma, pero ‘yung tuloy pa rin ang eleksiyon.

sana the senate and the supreme court don’t allow any of it to happen.   sana.    more and more it’s becomingimperative that the opposition get its act together.   otherwise gma’s annointed will win and we’ll have gloria mike mikey dato iggy forever.

update from ellen tordesillas:  Gloria Arroyo’s congressmen will convene the Constituent Assembly before it adjourns Friday.

* http://www.gmanews.tv/story/163907/Bernas-Gang-rape-of-Constitution-should-outrage-Filipinos

kon-ass (kokak)

it’s happening   :(   watch anc and weep.

Resolution 1109 calls for the members of Congress “to convene for the purpose of considering proposals to amend or revise the Constitution, upon a vote of three-fourths of all the members of Congress.”

Accordingto Nograles, HR 1109 would be taken up … because it only needed the vote by a majority …

He said approving HR 1109 was “easy to get as long as the majority are present.”

He said the debates expected about 1109 are “mostly saliva debates.”

“I advise you to stay on until 11 o’clock because it looks like a long night and it’s going to be 1109 all the way,” he told reporters.

ellen tordesillas warned us about gma’s palaka congress.   kokak.

Hardly had the croaking of the the congressmen who were at the Manila Hotel for the launching of what pundits call Palaka (Partido Lakas at Kampi) died down last Thursday when they were summoned by Gloria Arroyo to a room where she gave her marching orders: pass the resolution amending the Constitution.

Arroyo, the source said, offered the congressmen a hefty incentive: over and above their pork barrel, they will be given P20 million each.

The “undue haste” is because Operation Gloria Forever is already behind schedule. In the original timetable, a Cha-Cha resolution should have passed Congress February or March 2009. Proponents expected the judicial question to be settled, in their favor by June. That means, Senate can be ignored.

The writing of the new Constitution should be no sweat. Malacañang has a ready draft of the new Charter and all that is needed is three-fourths vote of the House of Representatives. The approval by the Supreme Court of 32 more sectoral representatives caused some adjustment in Malacañang’s payola budget. But what’s P5 billion for the 200 plus votes (at P20 million each) to buy Arroyo’s protection after 2010?

Once the Con-Ass has produced a new Constitution, the referendum could be held in September. The May 2010 elections would be for members of the parliament (if in the new Constitution the system of government would be parliamentary) or for president without the 6-year term limit. Real smart, isn’t she?

kokak.kokak.kokak.kokak.kokak.kokak.kokak.kokak.kokak.kokak.watdapak.kokak.

so long, gloria? 2

that unscheduled, and failed, trip to washington tells me how desperate gloria is for a one-on-one with the u.s. president.   i suspect she was all set to request that obama order the world bank to back off, cease and desist from, releasing any more information re corrupt practices related to infrastructure projects of her government, especially the report that points to hubby mike arroyo’s involvement.

in return kaya for what?  what was gloria prepared to offer that president obama might not have been able to resist?  maybe the acquittal of rapist corporal daniel smith?  maybe charter change and the lifting of economic restrictions?  maybe charter change and federalism and the signing of the moa-a.d.?  maybe charter change and the return of u.s.military bases?

suddenly i’m beginning to think that there’s more to the rumor that the u.s. wants gloria out and noli in, sooner than later, the better to foil an erap return, and that the world bank report is a big part of the effort to discredit the arroyos and agitate the people.  after all, it is the u.s. that is the power behind the world bank.  writes george monbiot in The Age of Consent – A Manifesto for a New World Order, 2003, page 16:

The World Bank and the International Monetary Fund, which are supposed to assist impoverished nations to build and defend their economies, are run on the principle of one dollar, one vote. To pass a substantial resolution or to amend the way they operate requires an eighty-five per cent majority. The United States alone, which possesses more than fifteen per cent of the stock in both organizations, can block a resolution supported by every other member state. This means, in practice, that these two bodies will pursue only those policies in the developing world which are of benefit to the economy of the United States and the interest of financial speculators, even when these conflict directly with the needs of the poor.

besides, it’s not like the world bank to be so high-profile rather than behind-the-scenes in its dealings with government agencies.  maybe the u.s. has finally given up on the recalcitrant arroyos?  maybe they’ve already made a deal with vice president noli de castro?

but if so, the u.s. must be rethinking its options now that noli de castro has been tainted by the legacy scandal.   as it turns out, legacy owner and operator celso de los angeles financed pala noli’s 2004 vice-presidential campaign and noli returned the favor in no uncertain terms.  writes ducky paredes in malaya:

Can Vice President Noli de Castro’s friends in the Senate (where he was part of an influential group of senators before the 204 elections) keep his name out of the Legacy scandal? He has clear ties to Sto. Domingo, Albay Mayor Celso de los Angeles, the owner and operator of the bankrupt Legacy Group of Companies.

Hundreds of thousands of Filipinos lost hard-earned money in Legacy’s fraudulent investment firm and rural banks. Can they actually forgive Noli de Castro’s role in their worst-ever experience? These people lost their life savings to someone who campaigned for Noli and was rewarded with a high post in Noli’s housing programs.

Of course, the Vice President is now distancing himself from De los Angeles after the latter’s grilling by the Senate for the questionable operations of the Legacy group and his companies’ investigation by the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP) and the Securities and Exchange Commission.

But no matter how De Castro disowns Delos Angeles, the damage to his squeaky-clean image has been done.

Noli De Castro admits that Delos Angeles financed his 2004 vice presidential campaign, caused the printing of his campaign materials, and even bought a tabloid to help sell him to voters.

So, immediately after De Castro assumed the vice presidency, he promptly endorsed De los Angeles as head of the National Home Mortgage Finance Corporation (NHMFC).

By paying a political debt to De los Angeles, De Castro not only epitomized everything despicable about traditional politics. De Castro also helped De los Angeles lure more unsuspecting investors and depositors into putting their money in Legacy.

How does the Vice President connect to the Legacy mess by his acceptance of the 2004 election funding from Delos Angeles and his endorsement of the businessman to NHMFC?

Simple. When De Castro endorsed De los Angeles, he vouched for the latter’s integrity, leading people to conclude that De los Angeles and his Legacy Group must be clean for having been given a seal of approval by De Castro, no matter how indirectly.

In fact, although Noli had no qualms dropping De los Angeles like a hot potato, it may not have been because of complaints to Gloria Arroyo that Celso was the worst thing to happen to her housing program, we hear that the two friends had already reached a state of enmity over a pretty young thing. Of course, the TV talent chose the more powerful of the two (and refused to return the jewelry that the other gave her as gifts).

How ironic that they were both working in the Pag-ibig program. Ang pag-ibig nga naman!

With the discovery of the dubious operations of the Legacy Group, shouldn’t the Senate do what it should have done a long time ago – investigate De los Angeles’ stint as head of NHMFC to uncover possible anomalies? In fact, isn’t it about time that they take a hard look at their former colleague’s work at Pag-Ibig and the Housing and Urban Development Coordinating Council?

Are they afraid that they may find that the foundation of our Housing Program is infested with termites like Celso and other Noli friends?

and then, again, what if mababaw (sort of) ang kaligayahan ng mga kano?  what if their attitude is, anyone but gloria?  what if, as jeg suggests, the u.s. has the goods on noli, too, and whatever gloria offers, noli promises, too?

well, at least it will be interesting to watch, whatever happens, or doesn’t happen.

do not delete 3

as for the pro-chacha argument that it is the prerogative of the legislature to initiate charter change if it so desires or deems necessary, and that we the people should allow the legislative process to proceed and wait until the proposed amendments have been crafted and agreed upon by both houses (voting separately of course) before we start the protests — well, yeah, that’s what happened back in 1970-73.   we allowed a constitutionalconvention, and then marcos declared martial law, and the constitution was tailor-made to his requirements, and it was “approved” not by a plebiscite but by hakot assemblies.   burned once, twice shy.

as for the the “need” to update the constitution, sez who?   conrado de quiros is so right:

. . . why change the Charter at all?

Shifting from a presidential to a parliamentary system, which is the only change Malacañang can be interested in as it would allow Arroyo to become prime minister, means nothing. The merits of a parliamentary government are theoretical, its demerits are practical. Its advantages are on paper, its disadvantages are in plain view. Even as we speak, we can see its infinite dangers in our very efforts to repudiate Con-ass. In a Con-ass, only the congressmen will vote to amend the Constitution, or all legislators – senators and congressmen – may have only one vote. We know that if that happens, Congress will act like a Mafia, as it did when it voted to kill the impeachment bids against Arroyo, and ram through Arroyo’s will on us.

Imperfect as it is, the existence of a Senate and House of Representatives is infinitely preferable to a National Assembly. Take it from Ferdinand Marcos’ Batasang Pambansa [National Legislature], or what we used to call “Bastusang Pambansa.” That is all it will be.

Indeed, far more basically, why keep inventing new constitutions when we don’t followthem anyway? Why keep manufacturing or foisting new laws-a constitution is merely the highest law of the land-when we don’t obey them anyway? First, let us reward the innocent and punish the guilty, then let’s change the Constitution. First, let us have clean elections and legitimate leaders, then let’s change the Constitution. First, let us give the Constitution a chance, then let’s change the Constitution.”