martin & pops – the best revenge

when i heard martin nievera on the buzz last sunday, i just had to read pops’ tell-all interview in yes magazine that drove the man to tears.

i also googled it, anong reaction ng fans, and the overwhelming sentiment is against martin and the significant other. they think pops did right to finally speak up and tell her side, reveal the pain.

hmm. ito ba yung schadenfreude, ‘pleasure taken from someone else’s misfortune’? we’re just happy that they’re all still miserable?

i think pops has been too sensitive about the “monkey” business. i’m not convinced it was derogatory, maybe because i remember calling my kids monkeys too when they were in that young and irrepressible monkey-see-monkey-do stage. besides monkeys can be cute.

sana tinantanan na lang sila ng media. or sana she just killed the story outright, gave katrina the benefit of the doubt. puwede namang hindi patulan, if only for the sake of the kids. this can’t be good for them.

of course i realize that it was a straw-that-broke-the-camel’s-back kind of thing, patong-patong na ang atraso ni martin, time to get even by revealing all and getting public sympathy on her side. pa-martir effect, kumbaga.

but there are other ways of getting even. ika nga, “you don’t cut off your nose to spite your face” which is a warning “not to act out of pique or pursue revenge in such a way as to damage yourself more than (or as much as) the object of your anger.”

because martin is right. with that unexpurgated telling of the martin & pops soap opera behind-the-scenes, pops has killed their best seller of a concert loveteam that had survived the broken marriage and continued to thrill and and titillate pinoys worldwide.

check out reviews (MARTIN & POPS -the magic lives on) of their hugely successful concert at the mohegan sun arena, connecticut just last year. beauteous pops teasing martin, “nagsisisi ka na ba?” and the audience lapping it up. i thought that was the best revenge.

media missing “the big picture”

so what was so big about the picture ricky carandang painted when he and his fellow media practitioners vergel santos, john nery, and juliet javellana talked about nothing but their small elitist corner of media where confidentiality between journalist and his/her sources is higher even than the national interest. newsstand.blogs.com even has the nerve to recap: “The journalistic privilege is indispensable to the free flow of information.”

oh please! free flow? you call that free? more like restricted, selective, problematic than free. in my book, the lowest kind of information.

i think jarius did the right thing. but it wasn’t the pros and cons of what he did that merited a whole show. it was what he said, the info he offered, added to info that emerged in the senatehearings, that media should be looking into. isip-isip naman, mga bata.

the question is no longer whether gma and/or the first gentleman were part of the fix — that’s already obvious, di ba, as obvious as her voice on the garci tapes. the question that media, and the senate, should be gnawing to the bone, instead of avoiding, if they are truly in the service of all filipinos, and not just of their publishers/networks and advertisers/sponsors and campaign contributors, is: do we really need a national broadband network?

because the answer is yes, never mind muna about the last mile chuchu. not only the government bureaucracy but we the people who already use cellphones and the internet but who find pldt and globe rather expensive as service providers would have a cheaper alternative in a national broadband network that’s run not for profit but for public service, lalo na kung di naman tayo pasosyal o tight ang ating budget at mababaw naman ang kaligayahan natin.

this is why pldt and globe are so against nbn in any kind of reincarnation, and ito na rin ang “razon” kung bakit pilit na sumasawsaw ang tycoons sa isang public service project. and so naghalo na ang balat sa tinalupan, kumbaga.

read manila times’ a backbone-breaking straw by benjamin g. defensor.

mvp & zte

so what does manny v. pangilinan of the telecom giant pldt have to do with zte-fg?

twice his name has come up.

once in the senate, when nene pimentel asked the two deans (one current, one former) of the u.p. school of economics something like, who did you write the paper for, that paper socritical of government’s national broadband network project. abah. it was commissioned by manny pangilinan of pldt no less for a very cool million bucks.

the second time in a very long text message from a “palace loyalist” that manolo quezon posted in his blog, to the effect that the zte deal involves a manila counterpart, and zte chose multimedia telephony (once owned by joey de venecia, now by bigbusinessman ricky razon na super-close sa arroyos and owns manila standard today), and that it was not only joey who was jockeying to become the manila counterpart, si manny pangilinan din daw

tried 2get a share of d biz but Razon wont let him. N return, PLDT paid d UP prof P1M 2 make d study dat wil put d NBN-ZTE look bad. PLDT s fundingall d bad PR on Razon & giving d oppositionsenators d bullets 2 kill d NBNZTE. NBN-ZTE s nothing but a fight of greedy pipol but could cause enormous economic loss 4 d country.

Manuel L. Quezon III: The Daily Dose

hmm, di ba. too much. how greedy talaga. talk about corporate social responsibility. nasaan na ang spirit of giving back to society? kung getting to that last mile ang problema, malinaw naman kung saan kailangan ang tulong, ang charity, ng pldt at globe, di ba? given their billions in profits last year (47!), they should be giving back, paying back, the right way, the right place, to the right people. instead we read in the inquirer about filipino firms investing $1.8 billion dollars abroad from january to june this year! and we read in the manila times that only 160 families own the economy and the politics of this country! where’s the justice?

but i don’t agree with the texter na cancelling zte would cause enormous economic loss for the country. i hope s/he’s just talking about the many other big projects that were in the bag na sana. because, sa totoo lang, nakaka-tense yang super-close relations ni gma with china. what’s she up to ba talaga? playing the china card and selling us out bigtime? is that really the way to go? can’t we be more creative than that?