Category: the left

The self-esteem of Ronald Llamas

So I was trying to ignore the Rowena Guanzon bruhaha sa Rockwell, and then I happened on a former general’s vlog on YouTube with the title, “Atty Guanzon, Sinupalpal nang Todo si Ronald Llamas Kapwa niya Kakampink?” 

Clickbait. Hindi ko na-resist kasi hindi Kakampink kundi DDS na ang datíng sa akin ni Guanzon — di ba kinampihan niya si Kiko Barzaga recently? — sabay, wow, she dared supalpal Llamas the Kakampink? About what? … E di da Rockwell iskandalo pala mismo, that Llamas couldn’t resist remarking on, being the very public heckler he is these days.

So. Apparently Guanzon, unmasked, coughed loudly in a very public place, just once, she says, more than once, others say, and, as she recounts on Twitter, a certain Chiong couple nearby dared call her out.

GUANZON: ” Dont u have money to buy a mask?” Chiong said to me condescendingly. Matapobre. Ikaw, dont u have money to buy a Rolex ? Hindi galing sa nakaw ang Rolex at Gucci ko. https://x.com/rowena

Next day, tila di nakapagpigil ang heckler. https://www.facebook.com/

LLAMAS: Bumaba na naman self-esteem ko. Wala akong Rolex saka Gucci eh.

Kinabukasan, binalingan siya ni attorney sa Twitter at sa DZRH News TV. https://www.youtube.com/

GUANZON: Okey lang yan, pogi ka naman. Naging kayo nga ni ano, di ba? …
https://www.facebook.com/photo/ … Marami ka namang baril, di ba u were arrested for illegal possession?” https://x.com/BalitaNgayon

Ang ayoko dito, they are taking advantage kasi nile-label nila akong DDS kaya binabanatan nila ako kasi. Takot sila na mag-senador ako. Llamas, mas bagay naman akong mag-senator kaysa sa iyo. Maawa ka naman sa Pilipinas kung ikaw ang mag-senador.

Doon ka sa line-up ni Risa Hontiveros, pareho kayong mga komunista diyan. Kasalanan ko ba kung pinanganak ako na hindi ako mahirap, kaya hindi ako nag-komunista? Ang problema sa inyo, gusto niyo komunista. Hindi ako bagay diyan—sosyalista ako.

To be fair to Llamas, he wasn’t arrested naman for illegal possession of firearms back when he was PNoy’s political adviser. And he has always admitted he’s a leftist but not a communist. Just the same, giving Guanzon an opening for this kind of bardagulan doesn’t do his cause any good, not when he’s so high-profile a propagandist for a moderate Akbayan that hopes to propel Risa to the presidency sa 2028. https://www.philstar.com/

Guanzon didn’t even have to name Hontiveros. Many already knew it was she that Guanzon was referring to, and word spread quickly, even if Risa denied it back in 2013. Friends lang, sabi niya. Chismax lang, sabi ni Llamas. Pero ano nga ba yung chismax? Ang nakarating sa akin, that it was true for a while, but it didn’t last, and neither cares to tell why, so better to deny. At least that’s the sense I get. And then again, I could be wrong, baka naman hearsay lahat.

It shouldn’t really matter, not in an ideal world anyway. Except that it does matter in the real world, where in the next breath kumbaga, Guanzon piled on the two, charging them of being komunista, which is the more troubling because the the DDS are lapping it up and regurgitating it as anti-Risa akbayad propaganda.

It was a mistake giving Guanzon that opening. Llamas shouldn’t have joked about his low self-esteem if he cared more about Akbayan and the people he purports to speak for. Hindi naman niya kinailangang sumawsaw sa drama ni Guanzon who was already doing herself in without his help. E ayun, binuhay pa niya uli, nadamay tuloy si Risa.

Hindi bale sana kung kakayanin ni Llamas na ipaliwanag sa madlang pipol, from his many media platforms, kung ano nga ba ang ipinagkaiba niya sa isang komunista, gayon din sa sosyalista-daw na si Guanzon. Masalimuot na usapín, di ba, na iniiwasan siyempre kasi medyo mahirap ipaliwanag nang hindi ma-o-offend ang mga komunista, na hiráp ding ipaliwanag kung ano nga ba ang ipinagkaiba ng Luneta sa EDSA, at kung bakit hindi sila maipagkaisa.

Good of Guanzon to push the discourse to this point, LOL. The ball’s in Llamas’s court. Though of course he could just keep laughing it off as he did today. Whatever works for his self-esteem, na napakataas pala, contrary to the self-deprecation.

Mayhem in Manila . . .

The co-incidence was too much.

In the week or so before the huge Sept 21 anti-corruption rallies in Luneta and EDSA, Duterte propagandists were exhorting their online followers to join either of the two, basta anti-Marcos at hindi anti-Duterte. Nung pareho palang anti-Duterte rin, nag-plan B sila: a Maisug rally sa Liwasang Bonifacio, come one come all. On the side, Tiktok was alive with promises that Sara would be president by September 22.

But lo and behold, not one of the Duterte bigwigs showed up in Liwasan on the 21st. VP Sara, Kitty, RobinP, VicR, LorraineB atbp. had flown to Japan for a Sept 20 OFW rally, samantalang si TrixC was on her way to Europe and has been tiktoking from The Hague’s “Duterte Street” since around the 22nd.

Anyare? So they never meant to make sipot the Liwasan rally? After all those pep talks about people power, as in, let’s-go-do-an-Edsa, bakit parang tinakbuhan nila yung event, bakit sila nag-disappearing act lahat? Dahil alam nilang hindi kakayaning tabunan ng Maisug ang mga Luneta at EDSA crowds? Magkakaalaman na, at mapapahiya sila?

It made even more sense when the ugly riots broke out in Manila, near the Palace. I couldn’t help connecting the awful turn of events to the missing Duterte VIPs.  Maybe they knew this was in the works, and they didn’t want to be around when it happened, so they could pretend to be as shocked and angry as everybody else, and point fingers at everyone else’s corruption except Duterte’s? Read “Pakana ng DDS?” https://politiko.com.ph/ 

Thanks to YouTube, I saw enough live shoots of the action, particularly yung bandang simula sa may Ayala Bridge, when one tire pa lang of a container van was on fire, and spreading, and about a dozen or more masked youths in black were throwing rocks at a phalanx of police who were blocking their way to the Palace. The police, practising maximum tolerance, could only cower behind their shields and stand their ground, even when the kids came at them and beat at their shields with wooden poles.

I wondered who these kids were. I couldn’t quite believe that these were tibaks from the Luneta rally (who were said to have moved to Mendiola for a last rite but didn’t stay), because if they were, it would mean that the progressive Left had suddenly shifted from nonviolent to violent protest tactics?

It seemed to me that these boys were a different bunch, out only to provoke the police into arresting them so they could resist, fight back, create scenes of chaos, and incite usiseros and bystanders to join the march on the Palace, the more the merrier.  In Recto and Mendiola parang mas marami na sila, may kasama nang streetkids and riffraff, at mas magulo na, naninira’t nambabato’t  nagsúsunóg, at nanlabán when the authorities finally moved to detain, arrest, some 200 of them, di na baleng maakusahan sila ng police brutality, the young thugs had to be stopped from doing even more harm.

And when it was over, what a relief that the mayhem was nothing like that of Edsa Tres (May 2001), and that the arrested youth mostly confessed quickly enough that they were primed and paid to pretend and to play at being angry anti-Marcos activists, and to attack Malacañang and call for the president’s resignation, or some DDS sheet like that.

CITO BELTRAN. Were … they “hoodlums for hire” paid to agitate the police into attacking the protesters with a plan of creating negative content and videos for online propaganda? Apparently so, after some of the people arrested confessed that they were paid P3,000 to create chaos in the streets and attempt to siege Malacañang. https://www.philstar.com/

Which is not to make light of the plight of those mistakenly arrested and detained. Gets ko naman the concern of the organized Left (militants and moderates) for these poor kids and their parents. But there’s obviously a lesson to be learned here: stay away from masked figures in black wreaking havoc, or suffer the consequences.

JOSE MARIA SISON (1939-2022)

By MARLEN RONQUILLO  

… For journalism that still cherishes the critical role that obituaries play in informing the broader world about those who recently passed away and what their deaths mean, the recent passing of Jose Maria Sison at 83 in the Netherlands would have produced journalism at its best and most exploratory form. The reason is whether you have the political persuasion of retired General Parlade/Lorraine Badoy or that of Luis Jalandoni, it is undeniable that Mr. Sison is one of the most consequential Filipinos of the 20th century. There is no Right-Left debate on this because it is a settled issue.

Jose Maria Sison or Joma presumably must have been inspired by Jose Marti and Fidel Castro. The struggle he led, though, did not have the success of the Cuban version and is currently swimming against the current in a broader world that has lost its appetite for armed revolution as a means of seizing state power.

In some corners, Joma is demonized and cursed, blamed for a long-running communist insurgency that has caused many deaths, much anguish and the nation’s seeming economic paralysis. We still remember the names Mr. Duterte called him, with the accompanying expletives. A national villain like no other Mr. Sison was to the former president.

In some quarters, Joma is hailed as the founding father of the Communist Party of the Philippines (CPP) and its armed wing, the New People’s Army (NPA), which has bannered the fight for national liberation since the 1960s.

Even the so-called rejectionists, who left the CPP after a fallout with Mr. Sison over his supposedly ideological rigidity, have ambivalent sentiments about him. They vilify and deify him at the same time, but they in no way have diminished the outsized role that he played in influencing the life of our nation. Note that he was the intellectual father of the longest-running communist insurgency in the world. The old Partido Komunista ng Pilipinas was a moribund organization still tied to the apron strings of the dour Soviet Politburo when Joma cut ties, then repudiated the old guards called the Lavaites in 1969 and aligned the new party’s fight with a fresher formulation called MLMTT (Marx-Lenin-Mao Tse Tung) thought. In that year, Mao’s China was still a communist experiment 20 years after its triumphal march to Beijing by a coalition led by peasants who “encircled the city from the countryside.”

The 21st century has been tragic to Mr. Sison. Leftists who rejected his call for ideological purity asked him, some in disrespectful tones, to “read Gramsci instead of Lenin.” From a peak of 25,000 in the 1980s, the NPA supposedly is down to just about 2,000 fighters today. Marxists guerrillas elsewhere have either made peace with their governments or been rendered irrelevant. Former role models, Russia and China, are now dismissed as part of an “arc of authoritarianism,” not true Marxist nations.

But even those negativities cannot downplay the consequential life of Mr. Sison. A man with a sense of history would have merited obituaries that trace his roots as part of a landowning clan in Ilocos Sur, his university days, his poetry, and his decision to turn his back on his class origin to lead a Marxist, Leninist and Maoist revolution.

The obits should critique his two books on Philippine society with the thesis that it was decadent, bankrupt and beyond reform whose salvation lies in armed struggle. With “US imperialism” now more of a shibboleth than the scourge of former colonies like the Philippines, they should ask if the two books still serve their purpose amid new revolutionary conditions.

A second look at the doctrine encircling the city from the countryside deserves to be part of the obituaries.

Meanwhile, the country’s literary figures should appraise Mr. Sison’s poetry in their obits for him

Of course, expansive coverage of his demise will not come. TikTok seems to have canceled what is left of the country’s sense of history. When that dries up, a nation loses interest in the death of a man who mattered, hate him or love him.

I never wanted to write about obituaries this holiday season, but this piece about Jose Maria Sison has to be written. Merry Chtristmas, Pilipinas.

Sometimes, the Heart Yearns for Mangoes

JOSE MARIA SISON

Sometimes, the heart yearns
For mangoes where there are apples,
For orchids where there are tulips,
For warmth, where it is cold,
For mountainous islands,
Where there is flatland.
Far less than the home,
And the flow of kith and kin,
Unfamiliar and now familiar
Things and places trigger
The pain of sundered relations,
Of losses by delays and default.
Direct dialing, fax machines,
Computer discs and video cassettes
And visitors on jumbo jets,
Fail to close the gap
Between rehearsed appearances
And the unrehearsed life at home.
There are colleagues and friends
That make a strange land loveable.
But they have their routines,
Their own lives to live,
Beyond the comprehension
And pertinence of the stranger.
Those who seek to rob the exile
Of home, kith and kin,
Of life, limb and liberty
Are the loudest to mock at him
Who is helplessly at sea,
Uprooted from his soil.
The well-purposed exile continues
To fight for his motherland
Against those who banished him,
The unwelcomed exploiters of his people,
And is certain that he is at home
In his own country and the world.

March 30, 1994