<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: kudos to carlos conde</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stuartsantiago.com/kudos-to-carlos-conde/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stuartsantiago.com/kudos-to-carlos-conde/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 08:03:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: angela</title>
		<link>http://stuartsantiago.com/kudos-to-carlos-conde/#comment-1080</link>
		<dc:creator>angela</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 13:49:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stuartsantiago.com/?p=663#comment-1080</guid>
		<description>reyna! ang tagal na nito, hindi pa &#039;ko masyadong asar sa kanya noon, hahaha, how times have changed ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>reyna! ang tagal na nito, hindi pa &#8216;ko masyadong asar sa kanya noon, hahaha, how times have changed ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: angela</title>
		<link>http://stuartsantiago.com/kudos-to-carlos-conde/#comment-1079</link>
		<dc:creator>angela</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 13:39:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stuartsantiago.com/?p=663#comment-1079</guid>
		<description>hey, buraot ;)  check out also the comment thread of http://www.stuartsantiago.com/abu-sayyaf-kidnap-for-homeland/
and see how anti-muslim he is, among other things...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey, buraot ;)  check out also the comment thread of <a href="http://www.stuartsantiago.com/abu-sayyaf-kidnap-for-homeland/" rel="nofollow">http://www.stuartsantiago.com/abu-sayyaf-kidnap-for-homeland/</a><br />
and see how anti-muslim he is, among other things&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reyna elena</title>
		<link>http://stuartsantiago.com/kudos-to-carlos-conde/#comment-1078</link>
		<dc:creator>reyna elena</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 13:38:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stuartsantiago.com/?p=663#comment-1078</guid>
		<description>@buraot,

hehehe leche! magkasunod pa tayo! yeah! i was checking the links and i was right after all hahaha, DJB the pretentious guy AKA educated sa US wala naman palang maibalandrang kalidad hahaha

thanks for this entry angela! it helps me understand the mental line capacity of DJB hehehe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@buraot,</p>
<p>hehehe leche! magkasunod pa tayo! yeah! i was checking the links and i was right after all hahaha, DJB the pretentious guy AKA educated sa US wala naman palang maibalandrang kalidad hahaha</p>
<p>thanks for this entry angela! it helps me understand the mental line capacity of DJB hehehe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BURAOT</title>
		<link>http://stuartsantiago.com/kudos-to-carlos-conde/#comment-1077</link>
		<dc:creator>BURAOT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 13:23:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stuartsantiago.com/?p=663#comment-1077</guid>
		<description>gee, i have to follow the links to see that, indeed, DJB aka Rizalist is a heckling Arroyo enthusiast.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>gee, i have to follow the links to see that, indeed, DJB aka Rizalist is a heckling Arroyo enthusiast.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seks at Sosyalismo &#171; Kapirasong Kritika</title>
		<link>http://stuartsantiago.com/kudos-to-carlos-conde/#comment-1076</link>
		<dc:creator>Seks at Sosyalismo &#171; Kapirasong Kritika</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 09:48:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stuartsantiago.com/?p=663#comment-1076</guid>
		<description>[...] nakakatuwa ang pagtuligsa ni Carlos H. Conde sa kontra-Kaliwang blogger na si Dean Jorge Bocobo sa blog ni Angela Stuart-Santiago. Salamat din sa isang entri niya, hindi na ako umiinom ng naglipanang mga juice at iced tea ngayon [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] nakakatuwa ang pagtuligsa ni Carlos H. Conde sa kontra-Kaliwang blogger na si Dean Jorge Bocobo sa blog ni Angela Stuart-Santiago. Salamat din sa isang entri niya, hindi na ako umiinom ng naglipanang mga juice at iced tea ngayon [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: angela</title>
		<link>http://stuartsantiago.com/kudos-to-carlos-conde/#comment-1075</link>
		<dc:creator>angela</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 10:32:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stuartsantiago.com/?p=663#comment-1075</guid>
		<description>thanks, teo ;) it&#039;s like waking up and finding my room newly refurbished exactly to my taste but without any effort on my part, ang saya!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks, teo ;) it&#8217;s like waking up and finding my room newly refurbished exactly to my taste but without any effort on my part, ang saya!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Teo</title>
		<link>http://stuartsantiago.com/kudos-to-carlos-conde/#comment-1074</link>
		<dc:creator>Teo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 19:25:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stuartsantiago.com/?p=663#comment-1074</guid>
		<description>@Caloy: Bravo! 

@Angela: Ganda ng bagong look!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Caloy: Bravo! </p>
<p>@Angela: Ganda ng bagong look!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: caloy conde</title>
		<link>http://stuartsantiago.com/kudos-to-carlos-conde/#comment-1073</link>
		<dc:creator>caloy conde</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 12:11:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stuartsantiago.com/?p=663#comment-1073</guid>
		<description>correction: &quot;...way before the word blog was invented,&quot; obviously, should have not have been there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>correction: &#8220;&#8230;way before the word blog was invented,&#8221; obviously, should have not have been there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: caloy conde</title>
		<link>http://stuartsantiago.com/kudos-to-carlos-conde/#comment-1072</link>
		<dc:creator>caloy conde</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 11:59:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stuartsantiago.com/?p=663#comment-1072</guid>
		<description>DJB said: &quot;That is irrelevant to the point that Carlos Conde and Co. in the Main Stream are afraid of interactivity, or against it for some reason as he did try to explain.&quot;

DJB, for somebody who professes to be the alternative, you suck at it. worse, you&#039;ve been twisting the things that i have publicly said.

where, may i ask, did you get the idea that i am afraid of interactivity or even against it? i hate to fling my credentials at your face but i was already blogging probably way before you know what URL stands for and way before the word blog was invented. i was already involved in the publication of web-based news organizations way before you probably realized that blogging is cool. i work for news organizations whose websites have some of the best interactivity and new media content in the world. i recently signed on as a correspondent for a web-only news organization specializing in international news and heavy on multimedia and interactivity.

and you? you blog. no, i take that back, because i, too, blog and i believe that blogging is a wonderful technology that can do the world a lot of good. i take that back. you, djb, don&#039;t blog. you heckle. and if your bloviations are the stuff that we should replace journalism with, good luck to us all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DJB said: &#8220;That is irrelevant to the point that Carlos Conde and Co. in the Main Stream are afraid of interactivity, or against it for some reason as he did try to explain.&#8221;</p>
<p>DJB, for somebody who professes to be the alternative, you suck at it. worse, you&#8217;ve been twisting the things that i have publicly said.</p>
<p>where, may i ask, did you get the idea that i am afraid of interactivity or even against it? i hate to fling my credentials at your face but i was already blogging probably way before you know what URL stands for and way before the word blog was invented. i was already involved in the publication of web-based news organizations way before you probably realized that blogging is cool. i work for news organizations whose websites have some of the best interactivity and new media content in the world. i recently signed on as a correspondent for a web-only news organization specializing in international news and heavy on multimedia and interactivity.</p>
<p>and you? you blog. no, i take that back, because i, too, blog and i believe that blogging is a wonderful technology that can do the world a lot of good. i take that back. you, djb, don&#8217;t blog. you heckle. and if your bloviations are the stuff that we should replace journalism with, good luck to us all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: angela</title>
		<link>http://stuartsantiago.com/kudos-to-carlos-conde/#comment-1071</link>
		<dc:creator>angela</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 11:45:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stuartsantiago.com/?p=663#comment-1071</guid>
		<description>hey djb ;) i did read the comment thread, sorry i missed that.  but it doesn&#039;t change my point that bloggers should practise, or at least try for, due diligence naman, lalo na pag tungkol sa political or national affairs, just because interactivity is not always good enough or present enough to serve as check-and-balance. 

otherwise you&#039;re preaching to the choir re mainstream media. and i&#039;m rooting for you in the wordwar ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey djb ;) i did read the comment thread, sorry i missed that.  but it doesn&#8217;t change my point that bloggers should practise, or at least try for, due diligence naman, lalo na pag tungkol sa political or national affairs, just because interactivity is not always good enough or present enough to serve as check-and-balance. </p>
<p>otherwise you&#8217;re preaching to the choir re mainstream media. and i&#8217;m rooting for you in the wordwar ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: djb</title>
		<link>http://stuartsantiago.com/kudos-to-carlos-conde/#comment-1070</link>
		<dc:creator>djb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 09:18:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stuartsantiago.com/?p=663#comment-1070</guid>
		<description>Angela,
That real blogs have active comment threads is to distinugish from online columns published by PDI for example, which even if they are online are not &quot;real&quot; blogs because they do not allow for interactive commenting. They have not evolved a comment thread and you still have to write a &quot;letter to the editor.&quot; 

The fact that I am commenting on your blog is only possible because you have &quot;activated&quot; your comment thread.

That isn&#039;t true for carlos conde&#039;s article in the newspaper, even if he himself has a blog.

If you had read the rest of the comment thread this point might&#039;ve occurred to you.

Now it is true lots of blogs don&#039;t get a lot of actual comments. That is irrelevant to the point that Carlos Conde and Co. in the Main Stream are afraid of interactivity, or against it for some reason as he did try to explain.

But I will not get shot in the back by a bunch of journalists whose profession is not exactly much better than worst of the blogosphere.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Angela,<br />
That real blogs have active comment threads is to distinugish from online columns published by PDI for example, which even if they are online are not &#8220;real&#8221; blogs because they do not allow for interactive commenting. They have not evolved a comment thread and you still have to write a &#8220;letter to the editor.&#8221; </p>
<p>The fact that I am commenting on your blog is only possible because you have &#8220;activated&#8221; your comment thread.</p>
<p>That isn&#8217;t true for carlos conde&#8217;s article in the newspaper, even if he himself has a blog.</p>
<p>If you had read the rest of the comment thread this point might&#8217;ve occurred to you.</p>
<p>Now it is true lots of blogs don&#8217;t get a lot of actual comments. That is irrelevant to the point that Carlos Conde and Co. in the Main Stream are afraid of interactivity, or against it for some reason as he did try to explain.</p>
<p>But I will not get shot in the back by a bunch of journalists whose profession is not exactly much better than worst of the blogosphere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

