Comments on: fucking for a fee http://stuartsantiago.com/fucking-for-a-fee/ Wed, 08 Feb 2012 08:03:08 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: angela http://stuartsantiago.com/fucking-for-a-fee/#comment-576 angela Tue, 14 Oct 2008 03:57:38 +0000 http://www.stuartsantiago.com/?p=464#comment-576 or man and woman could focus not on differences but samenesses, work out "equality" issues even, create new archetypes, i'm dreaming... or man and woman could focus not on differences but samenesses, work out “equality” issues even, create new archetypes, i’m dreaming…

]]> By: angela http://stuartsantiago.com/fucking-for-a-fee/#comment-575 angela Mon, 13 Oct 2008 10:33:14 +0000 http://www.stuartsantiago.com/?p=464#comment-575 hey jeg ;) how to "transcend the need for sex," wow, what a dream. that's what the priests, the bishops, the cardinals, the pope are supposed to be doing, and having to work very very hard at. you'd really have to have a spiritual vocation to be willing to suffer that sort of unnatural deprivation and discipline. most men would be a nervous wreck, di ba. it's the "guard(ing) against" that can be changed. why guard against, when man can work WITH, woman. instead of being repelled by menstruation, man could tune in to woman's monthly ovulation cycle, when is she safe, when is she not, why not... the sex would get better too... well, for the woman, anyway ;) hey jeg ;) how to “transcend the need for sex,” wow, what a dream. that’s what the priests, the bishops, the cardinals, the pope are supposed to be doing, and having to work very very hard at. you’d really have to have a spiritual vocation to be willing to suffer that sort of unnatural deprivation and discipline. most men would be a nervous wreck, di ba.

it’s the “guard(ing) against” that can be changed. why guard against, when man can work WITH, woman. instead of being repelled by menstruation, man could tune in to woman’s monthly ovulation cycle, when is she safe, when is she not, why not… the sex would get better too… well, for the woman, anyway ;)

]]> By: Jeg http://stuartsantiago.com/fucking-for-a-fee/#comment-574 Jeg Mon, 13 Oct 2008 09:49:35 +0000 http://www.stuartsantiago.com/?p=464#comment-574 <i>indeed. the racy dyke-bitch radical anti-feminist feminist scholar paglia would ask, who is really sexploiting whom?</i> That's what I asked in FV's comments section: "Who’s exploiting whom? When you go home from a night on Patphong and feel your severely depleted wallet, for instance. I dont know about you but in those instances [I'd] feel really exploited." Women have a power over men, and this power is sex. In the Genesis story, Adam chose to obey Eve rather than God and ate of the fruit of the forbidden tree. That's power. The way for men to guard against this power is to transcend the need for sex. But who wants that, eh? indeed. the racy dyke-bitch radical anti-feminist feminist scholar paglia would ask, who is really sexploiting whom?

That’s what I asked in FV’s comments section: “Who’s exploiting whom? When you go home from a night on Patphong and feel your severely depleted wallet, for instance. I dont know about you but in those instances [I'd] feel really exploited.”

Women have a power over men, and this power is sex. In the Genesis story, Adam chose to obey Eve rather than God and ate of the fruit of the forbidden tree. That’s power. The way for men to guard against this power is to transcend the need for sex. But who wants that, eh?

]]>