<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>StuartSantiago.com &#187; supreme court</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stuartsantiago.com/category/supreme-court/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stuartsantiago.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 12:38:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>corona to testify #cj trial</title>
		<link>http://stuartsantiago.com/corona-to-testify-cj-trial/</link>
		<comments>http://stuartsantiago.com/corona-to-testify-cj-trial/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 14:58:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>angela</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[impeachment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stuartsantiago.com/?p=6533</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[it was senator jinggoy estrada who addressed defense counsel yesterday and strongly urged that chief justice renato corona testify, the sooner the better, so we can all get to the truth and not waste time, or something to that effect.  &#8230; <a href="http://stuartsantiago.com/corona-to-testify-cj-trial/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://stuartsantiago.com/corona-to-testify-cj-trial/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>miriam&#8217;s hell  #cj trial</title>
		<link>http://stuartsantiago.com/miriams-hell-cj-trial/</link>
		<comments>http://stuartsantiago.com/miriams-hell-cj-trial/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2012 07:36:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>angela</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[aquino admin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impeachment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[miriam defensor-santiago]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stuartsantiago.com/?p=6215</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i am neither anti- nor pro-corona.  if he&#8217;s convicted, fine.  if he&#8217;s acquitted, fine.  i didn&#8217;t like him from the moment he accepted the midnight appointment, but that&#8217;s not a high crime, &#8216;no? nothing will change, anyway, if corona is &#8230; <a href="http://stuartsantiago.com/miriams-hell-cj-trial/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://stuartsantiago.com/miriams-hell-cj-trial/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>presidential backing #cj trial</title>
		<link>http://stuartsantiago.com/presidential-backing-cj-trial/</link>
		<comments>http://stuartsantiago.com/presidential-backing-cj-trial/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 12:34:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>angela</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[impeachment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stuartsantiago.com/?p=6184</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[day 24.  the prosecution&#8217;s request that the court subpoena justice ma. lourdes sereno to testify on her dissenting opinion (re the TRO on de lima&#8217;s watchlist order) was denied by presiding judge enrile.  senator judge trillanes also withdrew his request &#8230; <a href="http://stuartsantiago.com/presidential-backing-cj-trial/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://stuartsantiago.com/presidential-backing-cj-trial/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>corona impeachment: let&#8217;s hear it all, prosecution AND defense!</title>
		<link>http://stuartsantiago.com/corona-impeachment-lets-hear-it-all-prosecution-and-defense/</link>
		<comments>http://stuartsantiago.com/corona-impeachment-lets-hear-it-all-prosecution-and-defense/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 09:55:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>angela</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[aquino admin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impeachment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stuartsantiago.com/?p=5871</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i like it that chief justice corona is not resigning, instead will face trial in the senate.  it would be good for us all, since phnoy has seen fit to get him impeached by the house of reps, to see &#8230; <a href="http://stuartsantiago.com/corona-impeachment-lets-hear-it-all-prosecution-and-defense/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://stuartsantiago.com/corona-impeachment-lets-hear-it-all-prosecution-and-defense/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>armida: what if, people power vs SC</title>
		<link>http://stuartsantiago.com/armida-what-if-people-power-vs-sc/</link>
		<comments>http://stuartsantiago.com/armida-what-if-people-power-vs-sc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 10:24:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>angela</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[armida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[people power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stuartsantiago.com/?p=5734</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[read armida siguion-reyna&#8216;s What people want.  she ends with thoughts of people power. I’ve been told there are lawyers invoking “the rule of law” and the Philippine Constitution, and I understand where they’re coming from. But, and this is a &#8230; <a href="http://stuartsantiago.com/armida-what-if-people-power-vs-sc/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://stuartsantiago.com/armida-what-if-people-power-vs-sc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>televise the trial</title>
		<link>http://stuartsantiago.com/televise-the-trial/</link>
		<comments>http://stuartsantiago.com/televise-the-trial/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Nov 2010 10:45:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>angela</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ampatuan trials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aquino admin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stuartsantiago.com/?p=2779</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In spite of the fact that the Maguindanao Massacre is an open-and-shut case, with the guilt of the accused very clear, justice for the victims and their families is still far off. Can’t P-Noy’s administration and the Supreme Court make &#8230; <a href="http://stuartsantiago.com/televise-the-trial/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://stuartsantiago.com/televise-the-trial/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>fear &amp; loathing in/for hacienda luisita</title>
		<link>http://stuartsantiago.com/fear-loathing-infor-hacienda-luisita/</link>
		<comments>http://stuartsantiago.com/fear-loathing-infor-hacienda-luisita/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 08:38:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>angela</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[hacienda luisita]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[land reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[noynoy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stuartsantiago.com/?p=2391</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[so hacienda luisita inc. has started buying off, i mean, paying off, i mean, distributing initial financial aid to farmers ranging, acc to anc, from 500 to a few thousand bucks.   grabe.   can&#8217;t blame the farmers (for caving in) but &#8230; <a href="http://stuartsantiago.com/fear-loathing-infor-hacienda-luisita/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://stuartsantiago.com/fear-loathing-infor-hacienda-luisita/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>29</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>supreme court should let trillanes go</title>
		<link>http://stuartsantiago.com/supreme-court-should-let-trillanes-go/</link>
		<comments>http://stuartsantiago.com/supreme-court-should-let-trillanes-go/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 05:32:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>angela</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trillanes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stuartsantiago.com/?p=2349</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8230; to the inaugural session of the senate of which he is a member, elected into office by more than 11 mllion voters in 2007.   i mean, you know, if he was not going to be allowedpala to BE &#8230; <a href="http://stuartsantiago.com/supreme-court-should-let-trillanes-go/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://stuartsantiago.com/supreme-court-should-let-trillanes-go/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>noynoy vs. the supremes</title>
		<link>http://stuartsantiago.com/noynoy-vs-the-supremes/</link>
		<comments>http://stuartsantiago.com/noynoy-vs-the-supremes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 07:49:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>angela</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[noynoy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stuartsantiago.com/?p=2127</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CONSTITUTIONALIST Joaquin Bernas on Wednesday urged president-apparent Benigno Aquino III to set aside his opposition to the appointment of Chief Justice Renato Corona as a way of avoiding a constitutional crisis. but a constitutional crisis is already upon us, thanks &#8230; <a href="http://stuartsantiago.com/noynoy-vs-the-supremes/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://stuartsantiago.com/noynoy-vs-the-supremes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>hearsay not good enough</title>
		<link>http://stuartsantiago.com/hearsay-not-good-enough/</link>
		<comments>http://stuartsantiago.com/hearsay-not-good-enough/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 11:23:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>angela</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ampatuan trials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stuartsantiago.com/?p=1845</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Court should allow live coverage of Ampatuan trial Neal Cruz Why is live coverage by the media of the Ampatuan trial being prohibited? Isn’t that a denial of the public’s right to information? I understand that the judge wants to &#8230; <a href="http://stuartsantiago.com/hearsay-not-good-enough/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://stuartsantiago.com/hearsay-not-good-enough/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>no live coverage of ampatuan trial :(</title>
		<link>http://stuartsantiago.com/no-live-coverage-of-ampatuan-trial/</link>
		<comments>http://stuartsantiago.com/no-live-coverage-of-ampatuan-trial/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 13:50:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>angela</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ampatuan trials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stuartsantiago.com/?p=1833</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Supreme Court spokesperson Atty. Midas Marquez said that only 30 accredited media, close relatives and counsels of complainants and defendants would be allowed inside the court room. “I am asking for everyone’s cooperation. We are doing this for everyone’s sake, &#8230; <a href="http://stuartsantiago.com/no-live-coverage-of-ampatuan-trial/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://stuartsantiago.com/no-live-coverage-of-ampatuan-trial/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>minding the supreme court</title>
		<link>http://stuartsantiago.com/minding-the-supreme-court/</link>
		<comments>http://stuartsantiago.com/minding-the-supreme-court/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 11:09:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>angela</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[cha-cha]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stuartsantiago.com/?p=1144</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[if you&#8217;re not clear what the con-ass ram-through was all about, or why people are angry with the lower house of congress, read jarius bondoc&#8217;s Do they have SC in their pocket? and if his suspicion is correct, na kaya pala &#8230; <a href="http://stuartsantiago.com/minding-the-supreme-court/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://stuartsantiago.com/minding-the-supreme-court/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

